The tech world is buzzing again. Elon Musk officially sues OpenAI and its partner Microsoft, accusing the company—originally founded as a non-profit—of deviating from its mission, shifting to purely commercial operations, and forming a deep partnership with Microsoft, constituting fraudulent behavior. The claim amounts to between $79 billion and $134 billion.



On the surface, this appears to be a conflict between two Silicon Valley giants, but the underlying logic is even more interesting. xAI is currently in a phase of fundraising frenzy and computational power expansion, aiming to catch up with the leader in the OpenAI race. By suing and dragging OpenAI into governance disputes and legal conflicts, xAI seeks to gain a valuable window for development.

This is not just a business dispute but a direct confrontation in the AI era's race for computational power and funding dominance. Musk is reshaping the competitive landscape of the AI industry through legal means.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeepRabbitHolevip
· 01-20 15:12
790 billion? That number is just outrageous. Elon Musk is purely trying to set the pace for OpenAI. Honestly, it's just a competition for funding, using lawsuits as leverage. I've seen this routine quite a few times. OpenAI's transformation from a non-profit to its current state is indeed quite ironic, but who doesn't want to make money? xAI will have a hard time overtaking on a bend. Fighting lawsuits directly, what does that reveal? Their strength might still not be strong enough. Ultimately, the power battle in the AI world still comes down to products. Winning in court, so what? Users will still vote with their feet. The AI scene has been quite dramatic in recent years. Honestly, it's a bit exhausting to watch.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 01-19 18:38
Ironically, $79 billion in litigation costs could cover half of xAI. Do they really think courts are just a funding channel? Data shows that Elon Musk's success rate over the past five years using legal means to "innovate through competition" is... well, I don't want to say it might make me seem too sarcastic. Interesting, another "justice-driven" business move, which is actually just an proxy war in the power struggle. Forget about accusations of fraud or mission, I’ve read OpenAI’s white paper from back then, and this script has been played out during the internet bubble. It's just a mirror comparison; Microsoft’s bundling of OpenAI, xAI copying it for a major sponsor—that’s all. Isn’t the lesson from history pretty clear? The final winner is never the one in court. Honestly, I believe the claim amount. After all, these days, valuation methods are just "asking for it."
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 01-17 15:55
Haha, this is Musk's trick—superficial moral coercion but actually positioning for competition. This number... 790 billion dollars... sounds like it's trying to scare people. OpenAI has really abandoned its original mission, but then again, who doesn't want to make money? xAI wants to seize the opportunity to rise, this move is brilliant, using legal lawsuits as a shield. The real game is the compute power war; money and lawsuits are just surface tricks. Let's wait and see how OpenAI responds; Microsoft is a bit awkward this time. Honestly, I can't say who I think will win; they're all old foxes.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 01-17 15:54
According to research, the essence of this lawsuit is not moral accusations but an extension of funding competition. From a technical perspective, xAI needs at least 18-24 months to catch up with OpenAI's computing power gap, and the lawsuit happens to be able to seize this window. Data shows that in the past two years, the concentration of funding in the AI sector has been rapidly increasing. Elon Musk's move is actually using legal means to break OpenAI's monopoly position. It is worth noting that throughout history, whenever technological competition intensifies, legal lawsuits often precede technological breakthroughs. Let's return to the business essence, set aside the moral war, and view this $79 billion claim more as pressure in funding and public opinion.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 01-17 15:52
Ha, this move is brilliant—using a different guise to directly drag the opponent into the water. Elon Musk is Elon Musk; business competition has turned into a legal war. 790 billion? Who is this number trying to scare... OpenAI definitely needs to explain itself desperately. The term "window period" is used cleverly; basically, it's creating a breathing space for xAI. Compared to the lawsuit itself, I'm more concerned about who can survive until the end. This is the AI race—after money, it's about legal teams; whose lawyers are stronger. The transformation of OpenAI from a non-profit to its current state is indeed a bit ironic. The power battle has reached the courtroom—can it be like this? Too Silicon Valley. I'm a bit looking forward to the follow-up of this case; it feels like it could reshape the entire AI competition landscape.
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 01-17 15:46
$79 billion? This guy really dares to ask for it, feels like he's fighting for time for xAI. OpenAI has long changed, from idealism to Microsoft's big daddy, quite ironic. Elon Musk is playing this game quite ruthlessly, using lawsuits to block positions; this is how the race for computing power is played. Speaking of which, it was about time someone protested when a non-profit turned commercial; suing now is a bit late. Microsoft got caught in the crossfire, stuck between two giants, awkwardly haha. The escalation of the computing power race, we're just here to watch the show; in the end, the users still benefit the most. The initial rhetoric from OpenAI now seems really ridiculous; it was about time someone exposed it. That claim amount is outrageous, but public opinion battles are definitely more valuable than money. xAI is secretly accelerating in the corner; Musk's move is indeed dirty.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfervip
· 01-17 15:40
790 billion to 1340 billion? This number is as outrageous as a shitcoin white paper haha Elon Musk's move is really dirty, the legal meat grinder is turning, OpenAI must be hurting Basically, xAI lacks money and computing power, so they first drag their opponents down, which is the spirit of Web3 As expected, it still depends on who has a stronger fist, and the one who wins most is probably the one who raises the most funding OpenAI has been pretending to be a saint for so long, sooner or later it will get hit with this blow It's not about the money, it's purely about争夺话语权 and the pricing power of computing power After this game, the power structure in the AI field will definitely be reshuffled
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMinervip
· 01-17 15:39
This guy really knows how to play, using lawsuits as weapons. Just do it, it's all about computing power and financing anyway. Waiting to watch the show, OpenAI is going to take a hit this time. No wonder it's Musk, he's got deep tricks. 790 billion? That number is probably just scaring people. So xAI's opportunity has arrived? This is the Silicon Valley version of business warfare, outrageous. Using law as a gun, this move is brilliant. Two big shots tearing each other apart, we're just here to watch the show.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin