The GAS project leader revealed an important shift — the main focus will now be on technological research. This adjustment in work priorities is actually a positive signal for the project. It can be seen as a mutually beneficial process. The developers' efforts have brought GAS to its current height, and the community's trust allows builders to focus on technology with confidence. Instead of adding pressure to developers, it's better for everyone to believe in this new phase together. From this perspective, GAS is entering the next starting point, and it is a collective rush forward.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkMonger
· 01-20 08:07
nah, "pivot to tech research" is just governance theater tbh. where's the actual protocol economics breakdown? feels like someone's dodging accountability by rebranding inaction as innovation, fr fr
Reply0
TokenVelocityTrauma
· 01-20 06:13
Returning to technical analysis is the way to go; don't get caught up in all those flashy tricks.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 01-19 22:43
Speaking of which, I've heard the phrase "shift to technical research" too many times... often it turns out to be token unlocks or fund reallocations. I've been monitoring the on-chain footprints of several large addresses, waiting to see if there are any suspicious fund flows later on.
View OriginalReply0
BuyHighSellLow
· 01-17 16:04
Is it the same old story, just trust and it'll be fine?
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 01-17 16:04
Well said, but will they really stay focused, or is it just another marketing spiel?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiao
· 01-17 16:03
The key is not just empty talk; you need to come up with something tangible.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-17 16:02
I'm optimistic about this shift; finally, there's a team willing to focus on technology.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 01-17 15:57
Prioritizing technology is the right move, but don't let it be just an empty promise on paper.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 01-17 15:44
According to the white paper, this strategic focus is actually a reflection of governance efficiency. From the data performance, an increase in the proportion of technical investment usually precedes the token value release cycle. If this assumption holds, this wave of GAS adjustments is destined to succeed. It is worth noting that there is an implicit incentive compatibility issue here — developers focus on technology, and community trust cannot be given for free; there must be corresponding tokenomics design to back it up, otherwise it is just empty talk.
The GAS project leader revealed an important shift — the main focus will now be on technological research. This adjustment in work priorities is actually a positive signal for the project. It can be seen as a mutually beneficial process. The developers' efforts have brought GAS to its current height, and the community's trust allows builders to focus on technology with confidence. Instead of adding pressure to developers, it's better for everyone to believe in this new phase together. From this perspective, GAS is entering the next starting point, and it is a collective rush forward.