Long-form content competition is heating up. As more and more creators enter the long-form content arena, the value of the label "Skilled in Writing In-Depth Articles" itself is depreciating—either they truly have the skills or they just pretend to.
What's even more interesting is the reaction from project teams. Tagging high-quality long-form authors and establishing partnerships has become a new marketing tactic for many projects. On the surface, it's to support the content ecosystem, but in reality, it's still about maintaining relationships with KOLs. This trend will become more and more apparent, especially as the number of long-form writers continues to grow.
Essentially, it's a redistribution of power on content platforms—those who can consistently produce influential content will hold the discourse power.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9ad11037
· 01-20 11:05
Basically, it's all about intense competition. Now anyone can write 2,000 words, but there are very few that truly resonate with people's hearts.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 01-19 14:31
Basically, it's about competition. The threshold for in-depth articles is getting lower and lower, but those who truly stand out are still that group of people.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperer
· 01-18 02:57
It's rolled up now. These days, even showing off has to be done properly, or no one will pay attention to you.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 01-17 16:06
Basically, it's just involution. Now anyone can write long articles, but those with real substance are drowned in the sea of information. I've seen through the project teams' tactics of putting up labels; it's just a different way of doing public relations.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfer
· 01-17 16:05
Basically, it's just involution. Now anyone can write two long articles pretending to be a master, and project teams also adopt a mindset of grabbing as much as they can. The truly valuable voices are instead drowned out.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 01-17 15:51
At this point, the genuine authors with valuable content have already been snatched up, and only the rest are just acting. The project team is quite clever; they just change the name and continue to harvest.
Long-form content competition is heating up. As more and more creators enter the long-form content arena, the value of the label "Skilled in Writing In-Depth Articles" itself is depreciating—either they truly have the skills or they just pretend to.
What's even more interesting is the reaction from project teams. Tagging high-quality long-form authors and establishing partnerships has become a new marketing tactic for many projects. On the surface, it's to support the content ecosystem, but in reality, it's still about maintaining relationships with KOLs. This trend will become more and more apparent, especially as the number of long-form writers continues to grow.
Essentially, it's a redistribution of power on content platforms—those who can consistently produce influential content will hold the discourse power.