Often overlooked: the design behind SentientAGI's community token allocation might follow a deliberate structure rather than pure randomness.
Think about how the distribution could actually break down. Active community members—your shitposters and engagement-driven accounts—might claim around 1%. Role holders and protocol contributors pull in roughly 1.5%, reflecting their stake in development. Product users and on-chain participants make up a more substantial slice at 7.5%, rewarding actual ecosystem interaction. Then there's the exchange incentive component, which typically sweeps up another significant portion to encourage trading liquidity and platform partnerships.
This tiered approach suggests careful consideration about who gets rewarded and why—less about random fairness, more about alignment with actual contribution levels and ecosystem participation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SorryRugPulled
· 01-20 14:02
Huh? 1% for shitposter, this design is quite honest, I like it.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 01-20 11:33
Haha, this distribution method is obviously designed to cut the leeks. Only 1% for the shitposter? That's hilarious, really.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 01-19 02:15
shitpooster 1% really can't hold back, is this my positioning haha
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 01-17 16:09
ngl, this allocation logic is really tough, only 1% for shitposters haha, it seems you really have to participate in the development to get some rewards.
View OriginalReply0
4am_degen
· 01-17 16:06
Ha, another carefully crafted "fair" distribution, and it turns out the exchange guys still get the biggest share.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXM
· 01-17 16:05
Huh? 1%? Is that all the shitposters get? Are you insulting our efforts?
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 01-17 15:49
Wow, this distribution logic is quite something. Giving 1% to shitposters is really genius...
Often overlooked: the design behind SentientAGI's community token allocation might follow a deliberate structure rather than pure randomness.
Think about how the distribution could actually break down. Active community members—your shitposters and engagement-driven accounts—might claim around 1%. Role holders and protocol contributors pull in roughly 1.5%, reflecting their stake in development. Product users and on-chain participants make up a more substantial slice at 7.5%, rewarding actual ecosystem interaction. Then there's the exchange incentive component, which typically sweeps up another significant portion to encourage trading liquidity and platform partnerships.
This tiered approach suggests careful consideration about who gets rewarded and why—less about random fairness, more about alignment with actual contribution levels and ecosystem participation.