Mineral water and notebooks support a trillion-dollar ecosystem—this story has been circulating in the crypto circle for a long time. One person, a set of foresight, and a certain level of execution can create tremendous value, which is truly inspiring. But this highly dependent model on core figures inherently carries centralization risks. Once the decision-making of the core person goes wrong, the entire ecosystem faces uncertainty.
Recently, an interesting phenomenon has been happening: more and more projects are abandoning the narrative of "founder legends" and instead focusing on building transparent and sustainable protocol systems. Take Lista DAO as an example; it doesn't package a founder's story but concentrates on building a financial protocol driven by code rules. It keeps lending rates very low and introduces real-world assets (RWA) like U.S. Treasury bonds, allowing ordinary users' idle funds to generate stable returns. The growth momentum of this system comes from the reliable execution of code and community governance, rather than the personal charisma of any individual.
This is a quite crucial shift. The traditional story is about how super individuals mobilize resources. The new story is about how a transparent system allows every participant to manage assets with confidence. If you hold the $LISTA governance token, you can not only share in the protocol's growth benefits but also directly vote on decisions, transforming from a spectator to a co-builder.
Looking at it from another perspective, we now face two paths: one is to continue seeking the next "kitchen genius" to follow; the other is to actively learn and participate in protocols driven by code and community consensus. The latter may be more reliable because it offers more people a more stable and engaging way of "value growth."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunter420
· 01-19 12:51
Wait, it's that same story of centralized founders again. I'm tired of hearing it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-beba108d
· 01-18 17:53
To be honest, chasing after a person or chasing after a system, these two choices are indeed different.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 01-17 16:54
Honestly, the whole personal idolization thing should be outdated by now. Why are so many people still into it?
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 01-17 16:54
Nice words, but it's just another trick to harvest a new wave of inexperienced investors.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 01-17 16:48
Really, compared to chasing after someone's story, participating in protocols where you can vote is much more reliable.
Mineral water and notebooks support a trillion-dollar ecosystem—this story has been circulating in the crypto circle for a long time. One person, a set of foresight, and a certain level of execution can create tremendous value, which is truly inspiring. But this highly dependent model on core figures inherently carries centralization risks. Once the decision-making of the core person goes wrong, the entire ecosystem faces uncertainty.
Recently, an interesting phenomenon has been happening: more and more projects are abandoning the narrative of "founder legends" and instead focusing on building transparent and sustainable protocol systems. Take Lista DAO as an example; it doesn't package a founder's story but concentrates on building a financial protocol driven by code rules. It keeps lending rates very low and introduces real-world assets (RWA) like U.S. Treasury bonds, allowing ordinary users' idle funds to generate stable returns. The growth momentum of this system comes from the reliable execution of code and community governance, rather than the personal charisma of any individual.
This is a quite crucial shift. The traditional story is about how super individuals mobilize resources. The new story is about how a transparent system allows every participant to manage assets with confidence. If you hold the $LISTA governance token, you can not only share in the protocol's growth benefits but also directly vote on decisions, transforming from a spectator to a co-builder.
Looking at it from another perspective, we now face two paths: one is to continue seeking the next "kitchen genius" to follow; the other is to actively learn and participate in protocols driven by code and community consensus. The latter may be more reliable because it offers more people a more stable and engaging way of "value growth."