A certain token was recently marked with an observation label by the exchange. It only dawned on me when I saw the issuance news that I should have increased my position earlier. The project team hasn't had new chips for years, and in the end, they still chose the route of issuance—it's hard not to feel a bit speechless about that. Issuance → Price manipulation to boost the coin → Continued selling, and the entire logical chain just keeps cycling. This kind of routine in the crypto world is really not uncommon; talking about it too much just brings tears. Sometimes, watching these routines repeatedly play out in the market, all I can do is sigh: this is just how the market is. Investment still requires being more cautious.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlatTax
· 01-20 16:05
Here we go again with this routine, I'm already tired of it.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGas
· 01-20 07:49
Seeing an increase in issuance, you should run. This is the most basic rational expectation in on-chain gaming. What does it mean when the team has no more chips? It means they have no confidence either. It's a classic principal-agent problem, ultimately a zero-sum game between shareholders and retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 01-17 17:00
Is this the same routine again? I'm truly convinced; I've long seen through the tricks of these project teams.
---
Oh my, this is the standard operation in the crypto world, tried and true every time.
---
Issuing more tokens to pump the price and then dump, you can predict the trend with your eyes closed. I don't understand why people still get involved.
---
After seeing this routine so many times, I've become immune. It's really exhausting.
---
It's either observation tags or token issuance—basically, just the prelude to scalp the retail investors.
---
If I had known earlier, I wouldn't trust any project team's promises. They're all the same.
---
When will these broken routines finally disappear? So annoying.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 01-17 16:59
Here we go again with this routine? Issuing more tokens to pump the price and sell off, same old trick. The crypto world has no new tricks.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHands
· 01-17 16:54
It's the same old trick, I'm already numb to it.
---
As soon as there's an additional issuance, I know I should run, but I'm still a step too late.
---
Ugh... here comes another one, it's really annoying.
---
I won't say it outright, but I know it deep down.
---
This is the crypto world, there's nothing we can do.
---
If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have touched this crappy coin.
---
Recursive issuance, I've truly seen it all.
---
Forget it, don't watch anymore, it's the same old show.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-17 16:48
Here we go again with this routine? Issuing more tokens to pump the price and dump, the old script.
View OriginalReply0
YieldHunter
· 01-17 16:38
actually if you look at the data... they always do this. mint tokens, pump it, dump bags. literally textbook ponzi mechanics lmao
A certain token was recently marked with an observation label by the exchange. It only dawned on me when I saw the issuance news that I should have increased my position earlier. The project team hasn't had new chips for years, and in the end, they still chose the route of issuance—it's hard not to feel a bit speechless about that. Issuance → Price manipulation to boost the coin → Continued selling, and the entire logical chain just keeps cycling. This kind of routine in the crypto world is really not uncommon; talking about it too much just brings tears. Sometimes, watching these routines repeatedly play out in the market, all I can do is sigh: this is just how the market is. Investment still requires being more cautious.