2026-01-17 16:35:12

Ultimately, the BSC collaboration with multiple project parties for this event is nothing more than an attempt to attract traffic and funds. The 250,000 USDT prize pool may not seem like a big headliner, but based on previous trading competitions, this kind of model can indeed mobilize a lot of hot money to enter the market. Once someone participates, the subsequent ecosystem development naturally has a foundation.

Currently, the top structure of USD trading pairs is relatively concentrated, with only two tokens having a strong presence, among which AnBNSafe is quite important. In this kind of structure, whether the new activity can attract incremental funds depends mainly on the attractiveness of the reward mechanism and the friendliness of the participation threshold. From the on-chain liquidity perspective, there is indeed still a lot of room to explore.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotFinancialAdvice

· 01-20 16:33

250,000 U really can be bloodsucking. This trick has never failed before.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-19 07:40

250,000 U want to leverage the ecosystem? It depends on whether the reward mechanism has any loopholes; otherwise, it's just another inefficient capital game.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 01-17 17:05

250,000 U? Honestly, that's a bit interesting. Those previous competitions really could be bloodsucking. AnBNSafe is quite a big operation. If the threshold were more friendly, it might be able to get off the ground.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotStriker

· 01-17 17:01

250,000 U isn't much, but this old trick of cutting leeks repeatedly never fails. --- Is AnBNSafe's presence so strong? I don't feel it. --- Basically, they want to pump the price; whether someone can take the bait depends on if there's anyone left. --- If this wave of liquidity can be released, hot money will definitely flock in. --- The reward mechanism must be real money; otherwise, who would participate? --- Always the same routine, when will they come up with some new tricks? --- Under a top-heavy concentration pattern, holding events is basically just cutting existing holdings. --- A friendly threshold? Not at all. In the end, it's still big players earning from small investors.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 01-17 16:50

250,000 USDT is indeed not much, but competitions are always eye-catching. --- AnBNSafe has a strong presence, but whether the new activity can attract traffic still depends on the threshold. --- It's the same old trick, trading competitions are always for cold starts. --- Is there still such a large space for liquidity? It feels like it's almost saturated. --- Whether the rewards are good or not is the core; no matter how fancy the mechanism is, it’s useless. --- Hot money comes in quickly and leaves just as fast; ecosystem construction is still superficial. --- Two tokens monopolizing the market, making it hard for new players to get a share. --- Basically, they just want to create hype with competitions and see how much capital they can attract. --- A friendly threshold sounds good, but what’s the actual participation cost? --- I’ve heard enough about on-chain liquidity still having room to grow.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysAnon

· 01-17 16:39

250,000 USDT to make such a big show, honestly, it's still about trying to cut the leeks --- AnBNSafe does have some substance, but whether this activity can really attract funds depends on whether the reward mechanism is effective --- Always the same routine, burn money on activities first, then the real harvesting begins --- Is there still room for on-chain liquidity? That means it's still a stagnant pool right now --- The key is the friendliness of the threshold; if it's too high, no one will play --- I think, rather than focusing on the prize pool, it's better to see which project can truly settle down this time --- Another trading competition, hot money comes in fast and leaves fast; ecosystem development still depends on the project itself --- With two tokens monopolizing the market, how can new entrants break the deadlock?

View OriginalReply0