Policymakers often get the priority wrong: too much firepower goes into dismantling large corporations in contestable markets, while genuine barriers to competition—rooted in outdated regulations—remain untouched. This disconnect was recently highlighted by a nation's leadership, including its deregulation chief, who argue that streamlining antitrust enforcement is essential for economic growth. The underlying logic resonates across industries: when regulatory frameworks become bottlenecks rather than guardrails, even efficient firms struggle to scale. For crypto markets specifically, this debate hits different. Overregulation of emerging financial protocols while allowing incumbent players to consolidate market share creates the worst of both worlds. The question isn't whether antitrust matters—it obviously does—but whether enforcement should target business success itself or actual consumer harm. When innovation gets strangled by regulatory complexity while established institutions face lighter scrutiny, the entire ecosystem pays the price.