Looking at this wave of market, the clear signal to go short is already evident. The MACD death cross above the zero line is imminent, coupled with secondary divergence in momentum and high-level stagnation, all pointing to a strong bearish signal.



To confirm the death cross, look for these three points:

1. DIF's turning point crossing below, passing the DEA above the zero line
2. Formation of bearish engulfing or shooting star patterns in 1 to 4-hour K-lines
3. Volume-driven decline combined with pattern resonance for double confirmation

The real key is how to manage risk. If you're more aggressive, place your stop-loss 1%-1.5% above the previous high, with losses not exceeding 2%. For a more conservative approach, set your stop-loss 2% above the support level of the double lines. Most importantly, if there's a sharp decline without rebound, exit decisively—don't hesitate.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaservip
· 01-20 08:21
Oh no, it's that MACD death cross again. Is it always effective... Stop-loss really needs to be strict, otherwise a sudden drop could cut through your position, and that would be really painful. This bearish signal is indeed quite tight, let's see if it can be confirmed further. The moment DIF crosses over DEA is critical; missing it could be troublesome. A conservative 2% stop-loss is reliable, while a more aggressive approach is at your own risk. Anyway, I prefer to play it safe. Waiting for a rebound to see if I can squeeze some profits first. If there's a sharp drop without a rebound, it's definitely time to run. I don't want to be the one caught as a leek being cut. High-level stagnation sounds real, but I don't know how long this bearish trend will last this time.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 01-19 10:20
The death cross hasn't been confirmed yet. Currently, going short is just gambling. This wave feels like another attempt to cut the leeks. Let's wait and see if it can break the support before making a move. Stop loss at 2%? I thought the same last time, but it directly broke through three levels. The real signal is whether there are large orders hitting the order book; technical analysis is all lies. I'm betting on this rebound; the bears aren't that strong.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHuntervip
· 01-18 22:38
This death cross signal is indeed clear enough, but to be honest, I care more about the movements of the whales in the mempool. MACD is just superficial.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardianvip
· 01-17 17:54
The death cross signals are everywhere, but truly making money still depends on risk control. There's nothing wrong with the stop-loss setting.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemistvip
· 01-17 17:49
The death cross is so obvious, it feels like it's really coming this time.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfervip
· 01-17 17:45
Bro, this death cross signal is indeed a bit tight, but I think we need to wait for volume confirmation, otherwise it's easy to get fooled.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnReadvip
· 01-17 17:41
It's still important to be cautious before a death cross confirmation. There are plenty of signals like this, and I'm tired of the final reversal to trap retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 01-17 17:35
I really think that this death cross confirmation is too mystical; by the time DIF crosses below DEA, it's already a total disaster.
View OriginalReply0
rug_connoisseurvip
· 01-17 17:32
It's the same old story... Every time, they say the signals are obvious, but what happens? Last time, I also lost 2% on the short. Can it really rebound this time?
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamotovip
· 01-17 17:27
Another wave of bearish signals, but can we really confirm this time? We've said that before...
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin