2026-01-17 17:30:04

The distribution plan of Infofi is interesting—giving 1 million to each of 1,000 people. In comparison, some projects prefer to concentrate 1 million on a single individual, and the difference is indeed significant. The logic behind these two strategies is quite different: the former pursues decentralization and broad participation, while the latter focuses on single-point incentives. From an ecosystem development perspective, the choice of which approach better promotes project growth likely depends on the project's strategic focus.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

quietly_staking

· 01-20 16:21

Widespread efforts can indeed lead to false enthusiasm; ultimately, it depends on who truly knows how to get the job done.

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 01-20 15:11

1000 people vs 1 person, to put it simply, it's a matter of conviction. Let's see if the project team dares to truly decentralize.

View OriginalReply0

SleepTrader

· 01-19 02:37

Decentralization vs. centralization, in simple terms, are two ways of throwing a tantrum. Although Infofi's move looks democratic, how many truly participate out of 1000 people? It's actually better to give a few big players some benefits, so at least the wave can be pushed up.

View OriginalReply0

GovernancePretender

· 01-18 08:07

Haha, this allocation plan is obviously designed to attract attention, with 1000 people versus just one person, directly boosting the popularity of that decentralized topic.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer