2026-01-17 17:41:25

The tokenomics design of SENT is quite interesting. The community receives a 66% allocation—this is exactly what we want to see. What's even more rare is that the team's lock-up period is quite long, and such long-term commitments are uncommon in projects. This design approach indicates that the project has a genuine long-term plan. Using this economic model to promote AI development in the crypto space indeed has the potential to become a new benchmark. I am quite optimistic about this project.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BankruptcyArtist

· 01-19 20:38

66% to the community? This time, they're not fooling around. The team locking for such a long time is pretty serious. Looks like there's really something there.

View OriginalReply0

PumpBeforeRug

· 01-19 03:34

66% to the community? That's what a proper project should do, unlike some trash projects that come out and VC takes half immediately.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-18 03:38

66% to the community, this is truly considerate. I'm just worried that even if the team's lock-up period gets longer, we won't be able to withstand the market manipulators' dump attacks.

View OriginalReply0

GovernancePretender

· 01-17 18:11

Giving 66% to the community is good, but it depends on how it's executed later. Hopefully, it doesn't turn into a scenario where big players cut the leeks again.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind

· 01-17 17:57

66% community allocation? This is the way it should be. Don't bother with those tactics to harvest profits from newcomers.

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-17 17:56

66% given to the community is indeed commendable; compared to those teams that cut leeks from projects, it's much more conscientious. However, I've seen many long lock-up periods; the key still depends on how they dump after unlocking...

View OriginalReply0

InfraVibes

· 01-17 17:54

66% community allocation, team leader lock-up... this is the proper way it should be, unlike some projects that immediately cut into VC. optimistic

View OriginalReply0

RetiredMiner

· 01-17 17:54

Community gets 66%? Now that's sincerity, unlike some project teams that are just bloodsucking. The team is really willing to lock it up for so long; actions speak louder than words, I buy into this.

View OriginalReply0

LightningClicker

· 01-17 17:50

66% to the community? This ratio really speaks for itself; it's finally good to see a design that isn't just about cutting the leeks. It's rare to see a team lock up tokens for such a long time, which shows they still have a conscience. The AI+crypto track is now very competitive, but this kind of economic model actually has some substance.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamBreaker

· 01-17 17:49

The 66% community ratio is really comfortable, and the team leader locking up tokens is not just talk. This is the sincerity I want to see.

View OriginalReply0