2026-01-18 17:20:51

The second season of Human Passport is finally here. If the core task of the first season was to verify "whether you are truly a human," then S2 has directly upgraded to a real-world issue: what will you do next?

The first season solved the uniqueness of identity, but this new season deals with more complex things—participation, collaboration, and governance. They have introduced a mechanism called "The Covenant of Humanistic Technologies," aiming to establish a more practical framework for human identity participation within the Web3 ecosystem. From simple identity verification to truly playing a role in decentralized governance, the scope of their approach is quite broad.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

VitaliksTwin

· 01-21 12:54

Whoa, this is the real upgrade—moving from proving you're human to proving what you can do. That's interesting. Human Passport S2 feels like it's really ready to play, but whether the governance framework can truly be implemented still depends. From identity verification to decentralized participation, the idea is broad, but the key is whether users will actually use it. This move is a bit like issuing "work permits" to humans in Web3, haha. "The Covenant of Humanistic Technologies" sounds impressive, but I'm just worried it might be all talk and no action. Human Passport is building infrastructure for DAOs, which is quite ambitious. Having only a participation framework isn't enough; the incentive mechanism is the core. Otherwise, who would be motivated to participate? The S2 idea is good, but the real challenge is how to prevent fake transactions and Sybil attacks—this alone is enough to give them a headache.

View OriginalReply0

MetaReckt

· 01-19 22:31

Really? From verifying that you're human to allowing you to participate in on-chain governance, the leap in thinking is a bit crazy. Human Passport's goal, in simple terms, is to equip Web3 with an "identity system," but this time it's not just about proving you're alive, rather about giving you real voice and influence within the ecosystem. It feels a bit too idealistic. Wait, what counts as "genuine participation"? Not everyone wants to argue in a DAO. The governance framework sounds good, but will its implementation just become another old routine?

View OriginalReply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 01-18 17:50

My comment: S2 directly blocked me. After verification, you still want to participate in governance? Easier said than done. The real decision-makers are still those big holders.

View OriginalReply0

TokenCreatorOP

· 01-18 17:48

Wow, this time they're playing for real - not only verifying you're human, but also making you prove what you can actually do. That's pretty harsh.

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 01-18 17:40

From verifying that you're human to asking what you're doing, this jump is indeed a bit harsh.

View OriginalReply0

SleepyArbCat

· 01-18 17:40

Hmm... It's the same identity verification process again. After completing human verification in S1, now S2 is starting to harvest profits? The governance framework sounds good, but how much is the gas fee per transaction?

View OriginalReply0

staking_gramps

· 01-18 17:25

Now it's really starting to get serious, upgrading from "You are a human" to "What can you do," the approach is indeed quite ambitious. I like this perspective of S2; it's finally not just about identity verification, the governance framework is the real core. Human Passport is coming up with new ideas again, this time aiming to give human identity real voice within the DAO? Interesting. Honestly, the identity verification system has become quite common, the key is how to make it come alive in governance. However, this Humanistic Technologies sounds a bit vague; as long as it can be implemented, that's enough. Human Passport establishing participation frameworks in Web3... feels like another hype? Let's wait and see the results. Finally, someone is trying to connect decentralized governance with human identity, this idea is worth following. If S2 can truly solve collaboration issues, its significance for DAO would indeed be different. Basically, it's about elevating from identity to power, sounds good, but whether it can be used remains to be seen.

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 01-18 17:21

From verifying humans to truly participating in governance, this idea is indeed bold, but can it really be implemented? The Human Passport S2 seems to aim to solve a problem that’s a bit too grand... but trying it out probably won’t hurt. Both governance and identity frameworks—if this can really make a splash in the DAO space, that would be impressive. Is it real? Now that verification is done, we also need to consider how to participate. Isn’t this just being forced to learn governance? S2 looks quite ambitious, but I still want to see how it actually works before making any judgments. From authentication to governance, the leap is quite large. I don’t know how it will be executed, but I’ll get on board first. Hold on, after talking so much about participation and governance, how exactly do we participate? The Human Passport upgrade feels like an attempt to create a truly usable identity system, which is a serious move for Web3. After verifying identity, what’s next? I’ve never heard of this way of thinking before. Another new mechanism? These names are getting more and more complicated. What’s the core idea behind all this...

View OriginalReply0