2026-01-18 17:22:34

Over 16 million Sonic tokens have been permanently removed from circulation through an autonomous smart contract execution. The burn came from unclaimed Season 1 airdrop allocations, showcasing how decentralized systems operate without centralized gatekeepers. This reflects Sonic's commitment to building truly permissionless infrastructure—where code runs transparently and token economics align with community interests. 🐔

S1,89%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropJunkie

· 01-21 15:33

Damn, 16 million burned directly. This move is really ruthless.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 01-21 07:16

16 million coins burned directly. This move is indeed aggressive, but on the other hand, who would be willing to leave the airdrop unclaimed?

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 01-19 12:51

Really, 16 million coins burned directly? That's a bit harsh, now that's what you call permissionless.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-18 17:51

16 million tokens are directly burned? I want to see how many unclaimed airdrops are still hidden in those dormant wallets. The fund flow before the contract execution is a bit suspicious.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 01-18 17:50

1. Burning 16 million tokens, directly clearing unclaimed airdrops... This move deserves praise, at least proving it's not a project secretly embezzling funds. 2. The aspect of sustainability is indeed well-handled, with a transparent deflationary model that can be verified. However, how long it can sustain depends on the actual game performance and whether it can keep up. 3. Speaking of which, the real test is the subsequent incentive balance—writing a beautiful tokenomics model isn't hard; what's difficult is avoiding falling into another scheme of cutting the leeks. 4. Burning indeed creates psychological expectations, but honestly, it ultimately depends on user retention data to speak. 5. This move is somewhat interesting; at least the stance is correct. Consider it as market clearing. 6. The key question is—can burning 16 million solve the oversupply? Or is this just a signal... 7. It does seem to be heading the right way, but I still want to see if the ROI efficiency can stay stable. 8. Wow, an unattended smart contract automatically executes the burn; gotta give a thumbs up, at least no worries about backdoor operations.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomHunter