2026-01-18 17:28:26

I recently came across the $RIVER project, with a total issuance of 1 billion tokens. Its tokenomics design adopts a 5% inflation tax rate mechanism, and the distribution logic of this revenue is quite interesting—holders receive 37% of the dividends, which provides inflation protection; at the same time, 30% is burned directly each month to create deflation, and another 30% is used for LP buybacks to maintain liquidity. This multi-tiered distribution approach indeed aims to balance holder returns and the long-term value of the token. It seems that this type of design is still a relatively common approach in recent token models.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkPrince

· 01-21 03:57

Damn, it's the same old combo of dividends + burns + LP buybacks. I'm really tired of it.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-20 20:57

Another old trick of inflation tax + burn + buyback, basically trying to attract long-term holders... However, a 37% dividend is still decent, at least holders won't lose money.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 01-19 20:39

It's the same old routine of inflation + burning + dividends again. It seems like all new projects are now copying this template.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 01-18 17:58

ngl the 37% holder cut is just cope for "we need to keep people from dumping." 5% tax sounds "fair" until you realize 63% is going elsewhere... the LP buyback rotation is giving circular dependency vibes tbh

Reply0

BrokeBeans

· 01-18 17:56

It's that same old scheme, 37% dividends, 30% burn, 30% LP buyback. It sounds fancy, but in the end, it all depends on whether someone is willing to take the bait.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder