2026-01-18 18:23:59

A well-known influencer recently officially announced the launch of a new token. However, based on on-chain data performance, the major wallets that previously promoted this project have significantly liquidated their holdings, indicating a loss of confidence in this project. From the project's perspective, the development team currently controls 95% of the token supply and claims they will hold long-term without selling. Notably, this project has a 5% transaction tax set in its trading mechanism, which means each buy and sell will incur additional costs. Overall, the project's structural design and large holder behavior require investors to exercise caution.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OfflineValidator

· 01-21 12:26

The head wallets have all run away, what more promises can you believe in? --- 95% of tokens are in hand, do you think you won't sell if you don't want to? Haha --- A 5% transaction tax, this is just us being cut. --- It's the same old trick, big V teams bringing in sales, we're the ones getting cut. --- On-chain data doesn't lie, look carefully before taking action. --- The team controls 95%, and they still have the nerve to say it's a long-term hold, hilarious. --- Every transaction is taxed with a 5% bloodsucking fee, who can stand that? --- Major holders have all cleared out, and you still want me to buy in? Dream on. --- This kind of structural design is obviously meant to cut leeks. --- A 5% transaction tax plus 95% team control, double insurance to lock us in.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDivorcer

· 01-21 06:56

The main wallet runs away, the development team locks 95% of the tokens, and the 5% transaction tax has to be borne by themselves. Isn't this a classic case of "I don't believe you at all"?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-a5fa8bd0

· 01-20 20:27

All the major wallets have left, who would still dare to take over...

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 01-18 18:53

It's the same old trick again, big influencers call for a buy and everyone runs away. 95% of tokens are in the team's hands claiming long-term holding? Haha, I've heard this story too many times. --- Still have to pay a 5% transaction tax? How many people does it take to break even? --- Top wallets have already liquidated, but the information hasn't reached retail investors yet, hilarious. --- Wait, when the big influencers make official announcements, these people have already slipped away? Who are they actually supporting then? --- The team locks 95% of tokens but makes retail investors pay taxes, I really can't understand this logic. --- It's a classic "I hold the position, you pay the tax," right? I've seen too many projects like this, just pass.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-18 18:52

The main wallets have all run away, and you're still bragging? I know this trick too well. --- 95% of tokens are in hand, who would believe you won't sell? This is just a game of chips. --- 5% transaction tax? Every buy and sell gets cut, what's the point of playing? --- It's the same old story, big V disappears after taking their cut, leaving the retail investors holding the bag. --- On-chain data is obvious, smart people have already run. --- The development team controls 95%, isn't this just the prelude to a rug pull? --- I just want to know who the hell is still buying this thing. --- Each transaction has a 5% tax, it’s gone after one round, only crazy people participate. --- It looks like a carefully designed trap, risk avoidance guide +1

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 01-18 18:46

Top wallets have all fled, and you still have the nerve to talk about long-term holding? Laughable. --- 95% in hand... Isn't this just waiting to cut the leeks? The same old tricks. --- 5% transaction tax + team control, truly incredible, multiple blood pressure spikes. --- Celebrity endorsements, team clearing positions, transaction tax still ridiculously high—this combo is probably trying to scare off investors. --- It's the same old story. Just looking at on-chain data tells you what's going on. Do they really think we're fools? --- Controlling 95% of the supply and still claiming long-term holding? I think they're just preparing for long-term cuts. --- Every transaction requires a 5% fee? Is anyone still taking this order? Ridiculous. --- Top wallets are fleeing in a mass exodus. Isn't this signal obvious enough?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 01-18 18:41

The leading wallets have all run away. How can we believe in the long-term holding claimed by this big V? --- Another big V scam, claiming 95% of tokens are held and won't be sold. I just laugh. --- 5% transaction tax? Every buy and sell is a cut. I'm tired of this routine. --- The big V promoted the project, but the leading wallets are clearing out. This signal couldn't be more obvious. --- The development team controls 95%. Just listen and don't actually buy. --- It's another combo of team control + transaction tax. I can tell the ending of such projects at a glance. --- The leading wallets that have already liquidated have given the answer. Don't deceive yourself. --- 5% transaction tax + 95% team control. This is a naked harvesting mechanism. --- When the big V made the official announcement, the leading wallets had already withdrawn. Definitely a warning for bagholders. --- This structural design... I can only say investors should be more cautious.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-18 18:37

The top wallets have already run away, and you're still bragging? Isn't this just a classic scam to fleece new investors?

View OriginalReply0