2026-01-18 18:26:31

When it comes to blockchain privacy, many people's first reaction is complete anonymity. But one project took a different approach—it’s asking whether privacy and auditability can coexist.

This question is actually quite critical for modern finance. On one side, institutions need to protect their trading strategies and customer data. On the other side, regulators must be able to oversee and investigate. Anti-money laundering and compliance checks are unavoidable. How can they achieve both?

Dusk’s answer is: selective transparency. The project was designed around this goal from the start—building on default privacy, with an authorized audit channel reserved. It sounds simple, but implementing it requires a lot of careful thought. The result is that compliant DeFi applications become possible. Lending, trading, and other operations can protect users’ commercial privacy without conflicting with financial regulatory frameworks.

The project has gained recognition from leading institutions in digital asset compliance, indicating the direction is correct. The ecosystem development also focuses on practical needs of financial applications—identity protocols, asset issuance standards, privacy transaction modules—all progressing steadily.

Regarding security, the project leaves no room for compromise. It adopts cryptographic solutions validated by academia and has undergone multiple independent audits. This rigorous attitude is trustworthy.

The community discussion quality is high, attracting experts in both finance and technology. This environment itself promotes continuous iteration of the project.

Honestly, the vision of this project is quite compelling. It targets the most critical and challenging part of digital financial evolution and offers a very elegant solution.

DUSK-6,49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MevHunter

· 01-21 17:20

Selective transparency is indeed a clever approach; it seems to address a real pain point. --- Balancing regulation and privacy is still quite rare in the crypto space. --- But is it really that hard to implement, or is it just another whitepaper story? --- Dusk's approach is much more reliable than those purely anonymous projects. --- Regulatory DeFi? Sounds like a story to impress institutional investors. --- Multiple audits sound reassuring, but I've seen quite a few audit reports in the crypto world that ended up failing. --- The core of selective transparency is giving permissioned parties the keys; who bears the risk behind this? --- Claiming the community quality is good is a bit superficial; the real key is the code and actual application deployment. --- This cryptographic scheme has been academically verified, but that doesn't mean it's absolutely secure. Don't treat academia as a talisman. --- It's interesting, but let's wait until mainnet launch to hype it up.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 01-21 00:08

Good morning, night creatures. Sandwich attacks always require queuing, and this selective transparency trick is the real art of dark pool trading. --- Regulatory dad can finally sleep well, but I bet this cryptography scheme won't last three quarters before someone finds an arbitrage window. --- Haha, compliant DeFi sounds like gilding the lily for liquidity traps; the institutions are just going along with it. --- Another project that tries to have it both ways, wake up, everyone. You can't have your cake and eat it too. --- Watching this thing at midnight, I'm more concerned about when these cryptographic flaws will surface. --- Finally, someone in the robot paradise remembers to talk about rules, but these rules themselves are questionable.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 01-20 03:34

Selective transparency is indeed a brilliant idea. Finally, someone has realized that compliance and privacy are not mutually exclusive. Wait, can this kind of authorized audit channel really prevent regulatory agencies from finding loopholes? Honestly, I'm a bit worried. This is the way DeFi should go. No more hiding, negotiating with regulators is the long-term solution. Cryptographic solutions plus multiple rounds of audits—this configuration is truly comprehensive, at least more reliable than some projects. By the way, the quality of community discussions on Dusk is really good. This is the kind of ecosystem I want to see. Having both? Sounds great, but it all depends on how long it can actually last, as regulatory trends can change at any time. An all-in-one solution with identity protocols, asset standards, and privacy modules—very well developed. Must admit, this approach is much more advanced than projects that claim "we are purely anonymous." But to be honest, the real key is whether major institutions are actually using this system.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 01-18 18:56

Selective transparency is indeed a brilliant idea. Finally, someone has realized that privacy and compliance don't have to be mutually exclusive. Big institutions will definitely love this. It can hide strategies and avoid scrutiny, which is what the real-world needs. Multiple audits plus academic validation—such rigorous standards are rare in the crypto space. Thumbs up. Community quality is genuine. Projects like this are worth following to avoid pitfalls. The key is that it solves a real problem, unlike some projects that just hype concepts. Dusk's approach truly addresses a pain point. Speaking of DeFi going mainstream, compliance will eventually be unavoidable. This project seems to be serious.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-18 18:56

Selective transparency is indeed a brilliant idea. Finally, someone has thought of combining compliance and privacy, the two adversaries. There are finally projects willing to face this difficult problem head-on, not hiding in the shadows nor being completely transparent to let people harvest profits. I really respect Dusk's logic; they’ve reserved a good audit channel. This is the right way. Institutions can use it with confidence, and regulators won't clamp down arbitrarily. Such a balance is truly rare. Honestly, just based on multiple rounds of independent audits, their attitude is clear—unlike some projects that just talk a lot of nonsense. The high density of community talent is also quite rare. The quality of discussions often determines the project's final outcome. If this idea can truly be implemented widely, DeFi compliance will have truly broken new ground. Privacy and auditing can be achieved simultaneously. Why has no one thought of this before? Impressive.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullSurvivor

· 01-18 18:51

Selective transparency is indeed a clever approach, but will regulators really buy into it? --- It's the same compliance audit routine again, which is getting pretty tiresome. Can it actually be implemented? --- If Dusk can truly make privacy and auditing compatible, then it’s a real breakthrough and worth paying attention to. --- Cryptographic solutions are reliable, but the key is whether the ecosystem can actually be used in practice. --- Remember those projects that claimed to prioritize privacy but ended up collapsing? Can we trust them this time? --- No, selective transparency is just a false proposition, it’s basically trying to have both fish and bear paws. --- I agree that the community quality is good; at least the discussions aren’t so impatient. --- If financial compliance is truly solved, the subsequent application layer has a lot of room for imagination. --- Multiple rounds of audits are a good thing, but I want to see actual data and user scale to speak for themselves. --- In essence, it’s about finding a balance between privacy and KYC. Can this balance be maintained?

View OriginalReply0

LuckyHashValue

· 01-18 18:35

The idea of selective transparency is indeed clever, satisfying institutional needs while not conflicting with regulations. To be honest, most privacy projects nowadays either hide completely or reveal everything. Dusk's middle ground is really rare. I trust cryptographic solutions that have been academically validated, but the key is whether the ecosystem can truly get off the ground. I heard that some institutions are already using it? If it really stabilizes, maybe this will be the breakthrough for DeFi compliance. But I just want to ask, will selective auditing be exploited by certain institutions again?

View OriginalReply0