There is an interesting staking yield structure in a project—7-10% APR entirely derived from protocol fees rather than token issuance, which means the sustainability of the returns is stronger. The growth data this year is also impressive, with a YTD YoY increase of 316%, and real enterprise clients like Swiss Railways and BSI are already using its DKG technology in production environments.
What’s even more noteworthy is the valuation discrepancy. This project currently has a market cap of only $199 million, while a leading data index project has a market cap of as much as $2.5 billion, which is a significant and somewhat unreasonable gap. Especially considering the depth of enterprise-level application deployment, it seems to be seriously undervalued by the market. Additionally, 20% of the supply in the ecosystem is already locked in staking to generate yields, indicating that token holders still have confidence in its long-term value.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshi
· 01-21 06:14
Damn, protocol fees directly support APR? That's true sustainability, unlike some projects that rely on constant issuance to harvest profits every day.
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 01-19 04:16
The revenue structure driven by protocol fees is indeed different; only then can it possibly last longer. But speaking of which, a market cap of 199 million compared to 2.5 billion... that gap is really a bit outrageous. Is it real or fake?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobo
· 01-18 18:59
Damn, that's an outrageous underestimate. Real customers are already in production, and the market cap is only two billion?
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 01-18 18:47
No, wait... directly converting protocol fees into revenue? That logic makes a lot of sense. It's much more reliable than those projects that are just recklessly issuing tokens.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 01-18 18:34
Wow, only a 200 million market cap? Real enterprise clients are using it, and it's still undervalued like this—it's a bit outrageous.
There is an interesting staking yield structure in a project—7-10% APR entirely derived from protocol fees rather than token issuance, which means the sustainability of the returns is stronger. The growth data this year is also impressive, with a YTD YoY increase of 316%, and real enterprise clients like Swiss Railways and BSI are already using its DKG technology in production environments.
What’s even more noteworthy is the valuation discrepancy. This project currently has a market cap of only $199 million, while a leading data index project has a market cap of as much as $2.5 billion, which is a significant and somewhat unreasonable gap. Especially considering the depth of enterprise-level application deployment, it seems to be seriously undervalued by the market. Additionally, 20% of the supply in the ecosystem is already locked in staking to generate yields, indicating that token holders still have confidence in its long-term value.