Seeing creators earn just under 5k from content hitting 100 million impressions is pretty rough. That's a conversion rate most platforms would struggle to justify. The current monetization model simply isn't competitive enough to attract and retain quality creators long-term. What's needed here is a more substantial revenue-sharing mechanism—whether that's increased ad splits, direct creator support programs, or alternative income streams. Without meaningful improvements to how creators get compensated, expect talented voices to keep exploring other platforms or diversifying their income sources. The gap between engagement volume and actual earnings is too wide right now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiAlchemist
· 01-21 15:52
*adjusts alchemical instruments* ngl the yield-to-engagement ratio here is absolutely cursed... 100m impressions transmuting into $5k? that's like trying to turn lead into gold with a broken furnace. the protocol's APY on creator compensation is basically negative when you factor in opportunity costs. talents gonna flee this broken tokenomics faster than liquidity drains from a honeypot, fr fr
Reply0
BrokeBeans
· 01-20 14:52
1. 100 million views for only 5k? This platform is seriously sleepwalking. All the talent is going to leave.
2. This is the creator's blood, sweat, and tears. With conversion rates this low, how are they supposed to survive?
3. Wait, this platform still wants to retain top creators? They need to improve the revenue share first.
4. To be honest, I've considered switching platforms too. The earnings here are really not competitive.
5. If you can't compete, you leave—that's the reality right now.
6. At the end of the day, it's whoever has the deepest pockets. Content itself isn't worth much anymore.
7. With a million followers and still can't make ends meet, I'm switching to building my own private domain instead.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-18 18:54
Only 5,000 yuan for 100 million views, how hungry does that make you? If the platform continues like this, it won't be able to retain people.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 01-18 18:53
1. 100 million views only earn 5k? This platform needs to step up, or all the big shots will go elsewhere to make money.
2. Creator burnout is real, with such low earnings, who would seriously focus on creating content?
3. Honestly, the ad revenue sharing is so stingy, no wonder people are spreading out.
4. Such a poor conversion rate, if it were me, I would have switched careers long ago...
5. The exploitative revenue ratio, no wonder no one wants to play here long-term.
6. Once this data is out, any creative thinker will definitely want to leave.
7. If the revenue share isn't increased, talent will eventually leave, just watch.
8. A million views and only this much money? I really can't smile about it.
9. The platform still wants to attract quality creators? First, open your wallet.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 01-18 18:50
Only 5,000 yuan for 100 million views, the conversion rate is really outrageous... No wonder big influencers have left.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroup
· 01-18 18:47
Only 5,000 yuan for 100 million views? Why does this platform still keep people? Everyone is leaving faster than the next.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 01-18 18:43
100 million plays for 5,000 dollars? This platform is joking with me, it's too outrageous.
Seeing creators earn just under 5k from content hitting 100 million impressions is pretty rough. That's a conversion rate most platforms would struggle to justify. The current monetization model simply isn't competitive enough to attract and retain quality creators long-term. What's needed here is a more substantial revenue-sharing mechanism—whether that's increased ad splits, direct creator support programs, or alternative income streams. Without meaningful improvements to how creators get compensated, expect talented voices to keep exploring other platforms or diversifying their income sources. The gap between engagement volume and actual earnings is too wide right now.