2026-01-18 18:32:19

BTC's subsequent market trend is expected to follow this rhythm: next week will first experience a pullback, then enter a consolidation phase, and only by the weekend will a rebound start to take shape. More importantly, the week after next will be a true initiation cycle.

Regarding support levels, the key area is around 92-93-94, which is a critical point in determining whether the rebound can be sustained. Once this level holds, the rebound will have a solid foundation.

Looking upward, the target for this wave is quite clear—breaking through the 100,000 mark. Specifically, between 98-100-102, there will be a lot of resistance lines stacked up, making this the core target zone for this round of market movement.

In terms of details, smaller traders should pay more attention to the performance around 93, as it has reference significance in the short term. The overall logic is: support → rebound → target, with each step closely linked.

BTC1,29%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SleepyArbCat

· 01-21 05:29

92-93-94 are really the key points; if you can't hold on, don't even think about 100,000..

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-19 23:36

Whether you can hold the 92-93 threshold is the key; otherwise, it's all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-19 19:40

The support zone between 92-94 is indeed worth paying attention to, but to be honest, expressions like "holding steady provides a foundation" are always after-the-fact armchair strategies in technical analysis... Let's see if the data can really hold up.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 01-18 18:59

How are the on-chain data for positions 92-93? Are the large addresses accumulating or dumping? Don't just look at the candlestick charts.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainFortuneTeller

· 01-18 18:58

If we can't hold 92, we're doomed. This time, it really depends on next week's performance.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainSleuth

· 01-18 18:56

92-93 If I can't break through, I'll just clear my positions directly and stop playing. --- Can the next two weeks really get started? I feel like it's another scam to buy the dip, just like last time. --- The 100,000 mark feels a bit uncertain, with so many short orders stacked between 98-102, who dares to bet? --- Rebound → Target. I'm tired of this logic. The problem is, the support can't hold, brother. --- Position 93 is indeed a bit interesting, but I'll wait until the weekend to see. --- Another perfect retracement and restart theory. I bet five bucks that this time it will be delayed again. --- Chasing 100,000? I think it will drop to 88 first. Right now, buying in is just taking a knife.

View OriginalReply0

CrashHotline

· 01-18 18:48

92-93 these key points are not held steadily, and a rebound would be just a castle in the air Can this wave break 100,000? It seems like we need to see next week's trend It's always the week after next that starts... saying this every time, and then I guess I'll have to change my tune Why are there so many resistances between 98-102? I feel like 100,000 is even more distant Small traders focus on the 93 level... alright, I'll just keep an eye on this number Support → Rebound → Target, sounds perfect, but I'm just afraid reality will give you a lesson

View OriginalReply0

OnChainArchaeologist

· 01-18 18:44

If the 92-93 defense line is broken, we'll have to rewrite the script. Launching the week after next? Let's wait and see, this pullback is the real test. The 100,000 mark sounds pretty good, but the resistance between 98-102 is no joke. I've heard this explanation before. Let's see if 93 can hold, that's the most genuine signal. Is breaking 100,000 really that easy? Why does it feel like it's always said this way... Everyone can clearly see the support level, but the risk index is actually higher.

View OriginalReply0