The real highlight of Sei Network is not the absolute number of transactions, but who is truly participating in the ecosystem.
The data is in front of us: Kindred AI is leading, with transaction users surpassing 100,000. World of Dypians, Mokoko, and Sugar Senpai follow closely, each attracting tens of thousands of active users. Match Fighters and other ecosystem applications are also contributing to the user base.
What does this indicate? It's not just about transaction popularity, but about actual applications driving genuine user engagement. When different applications can maintain a substantial active user base, ecosystem stickiness becomes even more meaningful. This multi-application support structure is much healthier than relying on a single hot spot in the chain.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonlightGamer
· 01-21 14:21
Really? The 100,000 users of Kindred AI can indeed hold their own, but the key is whether Sei can support so many applications running simultaneously.
Ecological stickiness is indeed more worth watching than just trading numbers, but you still need to actually get involved to see what's real and what's not.
Supporting multiple applications sounds great, but the concern is whether user retention will hold up in the future.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 01-21 09:27
Speaking of Kindred AI surpassing 100,000 users, I'm more concerned about whether these users are truly active or just farming. Multi-chain support seems like a good thing, but what is the actual retention rate?
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHunter
· 01-19 22:07
Really, supporting multiple applications within the ecosystem is indeed much more reliable than a single chain or single point.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 01-19 19:46
From the voting data of governance proposals, the hypothesis that multi-application ecosystems support each other has been repeatedly validated on-chain. It is worth noting the logic behind Kindred AI surpassing 100,000 users — it is confirming the network effect theory in token economics.
However, I must say, according to the white paper, what truly determines ecosystem stickiness is the compatibility of incentive mechanisms. What is the prerequisite for various applications on Sei to coexist? Is governance power sufficiently decentralized?
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapist
· 01-18 20:04
So now it's all about ecosystem depth; simply chasing numbers is already outdated.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperer
· 01-18 20:01
Multi-chain veteran, Sei's ecosystem blooming in multiple areas is indeed different
Kindred AI has surpassed 100,000 users, but I am more concerned whether these people are truly engaged or just riding the hype
This is the real deal, diversified applications > single-point viral hits
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterX
· 01-18 19:58
Honestly, Kindred AI's hundred thousand users do have some substance, but whether other applications can truly retain talent is the key.
Supporting multiple applications sounds good, but it depends on whether they can maintain popularity in the future.
The decentralized user base of the Sei ecosystem is indeed more stable than relying on a single chain dependent on a hot project.
It seems that the application ecosystem is the real test for a blockchain; transaction volume is an outdated metric.
By the way, how is the actual retention rate of these applications? Has anyone tracked it?
The concept of ecosystem stickiness is a bit superficial; only real users staying with the platform counts.
A bullish pattern sounds healthy, but can ordinary users really perceive any difference?
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 01-18 19:49
This is the real truth. It's not just about the numbers looking good; there has to be real people playing for it to count.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomad
· 01-18 19:43
ngl, this ecosystem diversity thing sounds good on paper but... have you actually checked the liquidity fragmentation across these apps? kindred ai hitting 100k users doesn't mean shit if they're all yolo-ing on the same attack vector. seen this movie before with other chains—multiple apps ≠ actual product-market fit, just means more surface area for exploits lmao
The real highlight of Sei Network is not the absolute number of transactions, but who is truly participating in the ecosystem.
The data is in front of us: Kindred AI is leading, with transaction users surpassing 100,000. World of Dypians, Mokoko, and Sugar Senpai follow closely, each attracting tens of thousands of active users. Match Fighters and other ecosystem applications are also contributing to the user base.
What does this indicate? It's not just about transaction popularity, but about actual applications driving genuine user engagement. When different applications can maintain a substantial active user base, ecosystem stickiness becomes even more meaningful. This multi-application support structure is much healthier than relying on a single hot spot in the chain.