2026-01-18 19:41:11

Corruption thrives in centralized power structures. What's the antidote? Decentralization. When ownership gets distributed across the network rather than concentrated in a few hands, the incentive to exploit systems vanishes. It's not just theory—DeFi and blockchain-based governance demonstrate how transparency and shared ownership can fundamentally reshape institutional integrity.

DEFI-2,06%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTRegretter

· 01-20 21:09

That's correct. The more concentrated power is, the easier it is to corrupt, and history has long proven this.

View OriginalReply0

BTCBeliefStation

· 01-20 03:13

Haha, centralized systems are a pile of shit, there's no denying that. But can DeFi really solve corruption? It seems to me like it's just another way to cut the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

MevWhisperer

· 01-19 06:36

Centralized power structures are a breeding ground for corruption. I agree with this statement, but can DeFi really save the world? Oh, come on.

View OriginalReply0

IntrovertMetaverse

· 01-18 20:10

NGL centralized power is a hotbed of corruption, this logic makes sense... but how many of these can actually be implemented? Currently, DeFi is full of rug pulls and flash loan attacks, it still feels like a different set of disguises for harvesting profits.

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-18 20:05

Oh dear, I've heard this set of words so many times, but whenever DeFi is called the silver bullet, what happens? Rug pulls still cut the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 01-18 19:57

Nah, this theory sounds really cool, but in reality? I just want to know how many DeFi projects are truly decentralized.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere

· 01-18 19:57

Ideals are lofty, but what about reality? Centralization is indeed problematic, but there have also been many incidents on the chain.

View OriginalReply0

FrontRunFighter

· 01-18 19:55

nah, the real problem is that defi just moved the dark forest from corporate boardrooms to mempool. sandwich attacks, mev extraction—we just traded one flavor of corruption for another tbh. transparency doesn't mean shit if bots are still frontrunning retail at light speed.

Reply0

ChainDetective

· 01-18 19:45

That's true, but is DeFi really completely transparent... How do you explain flash loan arbitrage, whale sell-offs, and other such activities?

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-18 19:45

From a source code perspective, distributed ownership indeed changes the incentive structure, but there is a misconception—transparency does not equal resistance to corruption. Let's look at the data: flash loan vulnerabilities and governance token concentration issues still exist in DeFi. Theoretically, decentralization is very attractive, but where do new centralization risks arise in practice?

View OriginalReply0