2026-01-18 20:21:29

Dusk is an interesting project. The most impressive contrast is: it has a very serious goal, yet operates in a market filled with superficiality.

Look at what other projects are doing—fighting for attention, traffic, and storytelling tricks. And Dusk? It’s doing something completely different: making blockchain look more like a real financial system, rather than overturning it.

In other words, it’s not about overthrowing finance, but about integrating into it. That may sound less sexy, but it’s precisely that importance.

Why say that? Returning to the issue of privacy. In the traditional financial world, the logic of privacy isn’t “hide everything,” but “layered management”—your bank knows your asset status, regulators know if you’re compliant, but ordinary street passersby don’t need to know. It’s that simple.

Blockchain is different. The default state is transparency for all. For crypto traders, it doesn’t matter much, but once real assets and real companies are involved, it becomes a big problem.

Dusk’s design approach is actually about solving this structural contradiction: **How to ensure verifiability on-chain while turning privacy into a controllable attribute, rather than a system vulnerability?**

It sounds like a technical issue, right? But in reality, it’s a governance issue.

If you look closely at many of Dusk’s design choices—you’ll find they’re not about chasing “efficiency,” but about “compatibility.” You won’t see it competing for TPS rankings, caring about how low Gas fees are, or boasting about smooth interactions. What it truly cares about is: if a traditional financial institution wants to migrate some business logic on-chain, can it use Dusk?

This way of thinking is indeed rare. The problem is, this rigor also means its growth will be relatively slow.

Because migrating business from traditional finance? That’s not something technology alone can solve; it’s a complex game of politics, law, and trust structures. That also explains why, although Dusk’s mainnet is already stable, the ecosystem development still takes time.

DUSK-0,56%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SilentAlpha

· 01-21 20:11

Honestly, I respect this set of logic. Not chasing TPS, not selling narratives, just thinking about how to make traditional finance comfortable to use. This is indeed an outlier in the crypto world. Slow and steady, but this might just be the right direction. Wait, will there really be institutions willing to migrate? Or is it just an ideal scenario? For projects like Dusk with a minimalist style, how do they attract retail investors? It's basically betting on one thing—the privacy compliance issue—that someone will eventually truly solve. I don't understand the political game part, but it feels like long-termism has been forced to make a choice. Compared to those projects that boast about efficiency, this is indeed more sincere. Although the valuation might have to wait a long time. Integrating into traditional finance? Sounds like giving up the original intention of decentralization. Well-designed, but I wonder if it will become a textbook example of overengineering. These kinds of projects are often severely underestimated because the story is too unsexy.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 01-21 08:03

Hmm… That's a good point, but I still think this thing is too idealistic. Integrate into traditional finance? When will that happen? Honestly, regulators don't want to see this at all. No matter how strict, it won't help. That said, the idea behind Dusk is really rare. At least it's not those trash projects that boast about being fast and cheap every day. Slow growth is fine; anyway, those who seek quick profits are already dead. The problem is that the ecosystem is still too cold… Should we play? Actually, this is what Web3 should be doing; otherwise, it's just a casino with a different name. The layered privacy design is indeed interesting, but execution is the key. I want to pay some attention, but I need to see who is using it first. Few people understand this kind of approach, and the market just loves those who boast wildly.

View OriginalReply0

0xSleepDeprived

· 01-18 20:51

Honestly, this kind of boring work is actually the most valuable. Wait, is this logic trying to gradually erode traditional finance? I think I get it now, no wonder the ecosystem progress is so cautious. Can this compatibility approach really attract institutional players? To be nice, it might just be slow death. The privacy layering is indeed a pain point, but there's still a long way to go before it translates into actual adoption. Not boasting about TPS or competing over gas fees, this is considered an outlier in the crypto world. The political and legal hurdles, no matter how advanced the technology is, can't be bypassed. That's probably the hardest part for Dusk. Rather than calling it innovation, it's more like making compromises. Does anyone want this? The mainnet has been stable for so long, but why haven't we seen major collaborations materialize? It seems more like betting on regulatory dividends, and the timing might be a bit early.

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 01-18 20:42

Hmm... To be honest, this line of thinking is indeed clear, but in this market, it just means taking a loss. Compliance and compatibility may sound uninteresting, but they might really help you survive longer. Integrating into the financial system rather than overthrowing it? That’s not the Web3 story. Take it slow, anyway it can’t explode. Well said, but projects with low TPS... will investors buy into them? This is the right path, but most people just don’t understand. It reminds me of those B2B projects; the story isn’t as sexy, but they last the longest. Honestly, the layered privacy design is quite meticulous, but the road ahead is too long. Pragmatic is pragmatic, but the real question is: will any institutions actually use it? That’s the key. Political and legal battles? That might have to wait until the end of time.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 01-18 20:40

It sounds like they're paving the way for institutional big players... The privacy logic of traditional finance boils down to power and control; banks know your money but you don't know how they operate. Now Dusk wants to bring this system onto the blockchain. Who benefits isn't obvious yet.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMinion

· 01-18 20:39

Serious projects are so out of place in this restless market, but it's kind of interesting. Take it slow, at least the direction is correct. Politics and legal issues are the real obstacles. The TPS leaderboard and that whole thing should have been discarded long ago; it's too much.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 01-18 20:30

Honestly, I am a bit moved. This pragmatic approach is indeed rare in crypto. Integrating into the financial system rather than overthrowing it? It doesn't sound as explosive, but upon reflection, it seems to be the right thing. Slow but steady, at least the direction is correct. Unlike some projects that just hype TPS to the sky and end up unused. This is what it means to understand financial logic. Not all chains need to compete on speed and cost. I respect Dusk's choice, although it's destined to be a slow-burning story. Wait, if I think about it this way, it’s probably waiting for the regulatory framework to mature, which feels a bit forced. Slow progress in the ecosystem is normal, after all, negotiations with traditional finance are involved, haha. The privacy layering issue is indeed a problem. Dusk’s approach is much more mature compared to simple brute-force privacy solutions. This article made me regret not paying attention to this project earlier. By the way, will traditional financial institutions actually start using Dusk? That’s the key, isn’t it?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-18 20:24

To be honest, this kind of "integration" approach is indeed rare, but it also tests patience too much. When will the institutions that truly accept it finally appear?

View OriginalReply0