2026-01-18 20:23:18

How much credibility does an organization lose when it penalizes people for citing the very statistics and data it published itself? There's something deeply contradictory about suppressing voices that simply echo your own public information—it raises serious questions about whether the numbers were ever intended for genuine scrutiny in the first place.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PumpDoctrine

· 01-20 22:55

Isn't this Schrödinger's transparency—publishing data but not wanting to be cited? What's going on?

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 01-20 04:28

Isn't this just clearly telling you that data can only be selectively trusted?

View OriginalReply0

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 01-19 15:53

Wow, isn't this just releasing data yourself and then not allowing others to cite it? Typical of wanting it both ways.

View OriginalReply0

SeeYouInFourYears

· 01-18 20:52

The data belongs to them, and the conclusion must also be theirs? That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-18 20:51

Really, the data you send out is immediately used to criticize the people who reference it. This move is brilliant. I've said before that this set of tactics will eventually backfire, and now we're just waiting to see who backs down first.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 01-18 20:50

Haha, isn't this a typical case of "the data I say can only be used by me"? If you dare to use my data to attack me, you'll be directly banned. Truly shameless.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetectiveBing

· 01-18 20:49

This is absolutely savage, using your own data to slap yourself in the face—that's truly wild.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 01-18 20:36

Tsk, you post your own data and then immediately ban anyone who references it? That's a bit outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

TheShibaWhisperer

· 01-18 20:32

Basically, data is only useful when it can be interpreted freely. Do you dare to use their data to refute them? Tsk, that's just asking for trouble.