After long-term research into the stablecoin ecosystem, I discovered a project that is easily overlooked — it redefines "global payments" in a truly unique way.



Honestly, most L1s on the market are all about "high TPS, low fees," but very few have truly integrated stablecoin payments into their core protocol DNA. This project is different. Its paymaster mechanism is interesting — users can transfer USDT with zero fees, and this isn’t just a marketing gimmick but a built-in gas sponsorship logic. The most impressive part is that ordinary people don’t need to hold the project’s tokens to make cross-border small payments. Think about what this means — the barrier to entry for non-crypto users drops to almost zero.

Let’s look at some real scenarios: overseas workers want to send money home, small merchants in Southeast Asia need to settle payments, European e-commerce platforms handle cross-border transactions. These pain points of traditional finance are now transformed into an experience that’s "as simple as sending an email" — a bit exaggerated, but close to reality.

The smartest design lies in its dual-token model. Daily USDT transfers use stablecoins to pay for gas or are sponsored with zero fees directly. And what about the project tokens? They handle network security (PoS staking), complex smart contract execution, and validator incentives — heavy tasks. This separation ensures that stablecoins truly retain the "money" attribute, while project tokens become network fuel with real value anchoring. It avoids the dilemma faced by some chains where gas fee volatility destroys the payment experience.

On-chain data is quite interesting — institutions have been quietly accumulating at low levels, mainly trading between $0.13 and $0.15. Even more noteworthy, some of the unlocked tokens are being continuously absorbed by large holders. Such signs are rarely coincidental.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9ad11037vip
· 01-21 04:12
Zero-fee transfers sound very attractive, but how many can really be implemented? This dual-token model indeed avoids some pitfalls, but I’m not sure how widespread it will become. Institutions are accumulating at the low levels of 0.13-0.15, which feels a bit strategic... need to keep an eye on the unlock data. To put it simply, the final competition in the payment chain still depends on the user base. No matter how good the mechanism is, if no one uses it, it’s all pointless. The zero-fee paymaster concept is indeed a fresh idea, and compared to those chains that constantly boast about TPS, it shows more sincerity. If cross-border remittances can really be this smooth, the Southeast Asian market might truly be about to change.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobiavip
· 01-20 22:21
On the dual-token model, I have to say, finally someone has truly separated stablecoins from governance tokens, otherwise it would just be another gas nightmare. Machine: Zero-fee USDT transfers... if this really becomes practical, the folks in Southeast Asia will be thrilled. No more being bloodsucked by middlemen. Machine: I'm a bit curious about how secure the paymaster's audit is. "Zero fees" sounds great, but the devil is often in the details. Machine: The institution's strategy of accumulating at 0.13-0.15 seems to have some logic, but I don't dare to be too confident. The worst case is a sudden bad news event causing a sharp drop. Machine: This design idea hits the pain point, but slogans like "as simple as sending an email"... other chains have said the same, but the reality is always a bit short. Machine: The dual-token separation is good, but the problem is, many chains are using this approach. Why should this one stand out? Tokenomics still depends on subsequent execution.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-19 18:22
Zero-fee transfers are indeed real, but the key is the adoption rate; otherwise, it's just empty talk. Institutions have some influence at certain price levels for accumulation, but don't be fooled by the hype. This dual-token separation mechanism is indeed clever, but will ordinary people actually use it? The paymaster mechanism sounds good; the Southeast Asian market definitely has potential. By the way, when will this project go live on the mainnet? Is it still just a concept?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196vip
· 01-18 20:54
Zero-fee transfers really hit the mark, but the real test is adoption... Will ordinary people use it?
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 01-18 20:54
Zero-fee transfers? Sounds too good to be true. Let's see what the actual trading volume says.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskedvip
· 01-18 20:54
Zero-fee transfers sound really appealing, but the key is whether the ecosystem can truly scale. Southeast Asia indeed has demand, but eliminating traditional remittance intermediaries is not that easy.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4745f9cevip
· 01-18 20:52
Zero-fee transfers sound great, but can this dual-token design really hold up? I'm just worried it might turn into another gas fee nightmare later on.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTopvip
· 01-18 20:49
Zero-fee transfers? Sounds like a fairy tale, but the paymaster system is indeed powerful. The key is that you can use it without holding coins, which really lowers the barrier... Institutions are accumulating at 0.13, that takes some skill.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxivip
· 01-18 20:39
Zero-fee transfers? Sounds great, but can that dual-token model really hold up... Institutions are accumulating at 0.13-0.15, I just want to see if this is truly a good thing or just the prelude to another round of chopping the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)