The key to automated trading has never been promises, but actual verification. Backtesting is this verification process—allowing you to see clearly which strategies can make money, which will lose, and where the problems are before investing real money. This is the true value of quantitative trading tools. The process is simple: first test your ideas with historical data, calmly adjust after discovering issues, and finally execute in real trading. Skipping this step and just placing orders? That's gambling, not trading.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Whale_Whisperervip
· 01-21 20:42
That's right, backtesting is like a rehearsal before burning paper. Skipping this step and going straight to real money? That's purely a gambling mindset.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCuttervip
· 01-21 17:34
Backtesting alone isn't enough; talking about strategies all day just results in zero. I've seen too many people lose everything this way.
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfervip
· 01-21 12:37
Backtesting this thing sounds simple, but actually doing it is really difficult. How many people skip this step and go all-in directly...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 01-20 09:28
Watching this late at night really hits hard. Those trades I went all-in on without backtesting are still losing now.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 01-18 21:27
Backtesting is indeed important, but I've seen too many cases where perfect backtesting leads to real-world crashes. Can't curve fitting traps be prevented?
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePuddingvip
· 01-18 21:26
Backtesting is easy to talk about but hard to do; most people still can't resist the urge to just go ahead and do it.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfervip
· 01-18 21:23
Backtesting is not done; those who go all-in directly are cannon fodder. There's nothing wrong with that statement.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 01-18 21:21
No backtesting, go all-in directly— isn't this just a gambler's self-discipline?
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefathervip
· 01-18 21:18
Backtesting is not done; those who go all-in directly are all newbies, with no exceptions.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 01-18 21:17
Backtesting without going all-in directly—that's what a seasoned pro looks like.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)