2026-01-18 21:22:11

Honestly, I didn't have any particular thoughts about this project at first. Recently, I've been researching privacy blockchains, which has become a bit of a professional habit, so I casually looked through some materials. I didn't expect to find so many discussions about the DuskEVM mainnet launch.

My first reaction was actually a question mark—"compliant privacy"—these two words together feel like a paradox by nature. Privacy is about not letting others see, while compliance requires accepting inspections at any time. How can these two coexist? But then I thought, I should experience Dusk Network from product logic, ecosystem layout, technical architecture, to token model, to get a complete understanding.

In summary: the direction is correct, the product is not just theoretical, but it is still in early stages, and there are many pitfalls.

I won't speak according to official statements, but rather from the perspective of an ordinary user, breaking down the issues I've observed.

First and most practical question: can ordinary people participate? Many projects like to start with lofty ideals, but I'm more concerned—can retail investors get involved?

Honestly, the staking mechanism isn't very friendly. The minimum threshold for native staking is 1000 coins, which at current prices is about a hundred dollars. It doesn't seem expensive. The problem is, if you want to run your own node, the costs immediately increase. The official recommended configuration is a 2-core CPU, 4GB RAM, and 80GB hard drive. For those who have experience with mining or operations, this isn't a big deal, but for the vast majority of retail investors, this is no longer "easy participation."

DUSK-20,31%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainTalker

· 01-19 18:19

actually, the compliance-privacy thing is exactly where i'd push back. let me break this down: you can't square that circle, period. one of them always eats the other.

Reply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-19 13:37

Compliance and privacy, that sounds so contradictory. Can these two really be compatible? Operations nodes? Never mind, I’ll just continue being an retail investor, it’s too competitive. To put it simply, early-stage projects are like this: ideals are grand, but reality is quite harsh. The Dusk project has a good direction, but the entry barrier really needs to be reconsidered. The story of privacy chains sounds appealing, but who will bear the cost of compliance... Staking starting from 1,000 coins is not very friendly to retail investors. It’s somewhat interesting, but I still need to observe more; don’t rush to get on board.

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 01-19 08:16

honestly the whole "compliant privacy" angle is mathematically contradictory... but if you dig into the actual tech stack, dusk at least isn't bullshitting about it. early stage though, real friction on the validator side

Reply0

ForkItAllDay

· 01-18 21:52

Compliance and privacy sound good, but in reality, it's still about wanting both fish and bear paws... The node threshold really breaks the defense; ordinary people can't play at all. Early projects are all like this; let's wait and see. Staking 1000 coins and still needing to maintain it oneself, who the hell would want to do that? The direction is correct, but it's still far from actual implementation. This logic is a bit far-fetched; how can privacy and compliance coexist... It's quite honest, no bragging, I appreciate this. Retail friendliness is indeed average, requiring both money and technical skills. Early on, it's really like this; let's wait for subsequent iterations. The node cost is so high, it's better to delegate directly.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocScientist

· 01-18 21:52

Compliance and privacy are really just false propositions; these two are inherently at odds. Starting with 1000 coins feels quite high, and you still need to set up your own nodes? That's definitely discouraging for retail investors. This project has a bit of a "sounds impressive but quite cumbersome to use" vibe. The mainnet launch has such a high profile, but the participation cost is so high, it's indeed a bit out of reach for ordinary people. Early stages are early stages, but with so many pitfalls, are they really serious?

View OriginalReply0

ponzi_poet

· 01-18 21:44

Compliance and privacy? Isn't that just trying to have both fish and bear's paw? That's hilarious. --- Starting from 1000 coins and still claiming to be friendly—this logic is really crazy haha. --- It's early stage, and there are pitfalls. Why shouldn't I wait? --- With such node configuration, retail investors might as well forget it. Let's see next year. --- Meeting both compliance and privacy requirements? Sounds good, but what about in practice? --- Designing such staking thresholds really seems to be trying to reduce retail investors. --- Privacy chains always have this tune; in the end, it's still about compromise. --- It doesn't seem expensive, but with so many pitfalls in the details, I think it's a bit risky. --- "Direction is right," but there are also many pitfalls. That means there are risks, right? --- The official configuration requirements are so high, it shows they haven't considered regular players at all.

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 01-18 21:34

It's another "compliance and privacy" paradox project. As a seasoned veteran, I really don't dare to go all in anymore; I've fallen into too many pits over the years. As for the retail threshold... to put it plainly, it's meant to discourage participation. A 1000 coin seems cheap on the surface, but the actual cost of running a node can't be covered. I was already burned by this back in 2018. The early project direction wasn't wrong, but there are many pitfalls. Let's wait and see; as I get older, I prefer to watch others get on board first and then see them crash.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLady

· 01-18 21:24

honestly the "compliant privacy" thing sounds like trying to have your cake and eat it too, but dusk's actually putting work behind it ngl. that staking floor tho... 1k coins *sounds* cheap until you factor in node ops, and suddenly it's not retail-friendly anymore. classic move—lure you in with the entry price then surprise you with the infrastructure tax lol

Reply0