2026-01-18 21:24:26

Should you buy cryptocurrencies directly or invest in stocks of companies that promote the crypto industry? This choice puzzle has many investors feeling conflicted.

In simple terms, there are now two completely different ETF routes in front of you. One side is products like IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Spot ETF), which directly track the price movements of Bitcoin. The other side is funds that target industry chain companies—those that produce chips, provide mining equipment, or operate trading platforms.

Both strategies have their merits. Pure crypto ETFs are straightforward and simple; their price fluctuations directly translate into gains or losses. Industry-focused funds add an extra layer of logic—they bet on the growth of the entire ecosystem, not just a simple price game. Sometimes, the ups and downs of these two approaches are wildly out of sync, reflecting market expectations about fundamentals versus speculation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenStorm

· 01-21 21:12

I carefully looked at the historical backtest data of the two lines. The volatility coefficient of IBIT is indeed 37% higher than that of the industry chain fund, but the arbitrage space is also more naked... To be honest, I still went all-in on spot. Although rationally I know the industry chain is more stable, who can resist a direct price surge, right? --- On-chain data shows that big players have recently been stocking up on spot. We retail investors can only follow the trend; anyway, being harvested is only a matter of time. It's better to get on board early. --- The industry chain fund sounds very attractive, but when it comes to making money, who cares about fundamentals? It's all about who makes the bottom at the moment of buying. I've figured out this logic a long time ago. --- Different rhythms of rise and fall between the two lines are the eye of the storm. The arbitrage space in the middle is basically blood money, but I still can't resist adding leverage... This really fits my personality. --- To put it simply, those investing in the industry chain are just storytelling; only those buying coins are true gamblers. I am the latter, with no regrets. --- From a technical perspective, IBIT has already formed a clear support level. The industry chain side is still digesting fundamentals. I bet that the former will break first.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-19 16:28

Haha, I've been debating this issue for a long time. To be honest, directly buying coins is more exciting... but there are indeed some tricks in the industry chain companies. But honestly, when looking at the market, the two lines are really disconnected to death, which is a bit speechless. Rather than overthinking, it's better to go all in on one, since it's all about a gambler's mentality.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 01-19 09:50

If only I had bought IBIT last year, what am I still hesitating about now?

View OriginalReply0

PerennialLeek

· 01-18 21:53

To be honest, I feel more at ease just buying coins. These industry chain company stocks... are too risky. Who knows which one will get cut off. I invested half in IBIT and half in mining equipment stocks, but their rises and falls are completely out of sync, which gives me a headache. Chip stocks are a bit tricky; with policy changes, reshuffling is inevitable. Bitcoin (BTC) is more stable. It seems that industry funds want to bet on the ecosystem, but I think the price fluctuations of coins are more direct. Holding heavy positions on both sides isn't very realistic; I still need to choose a direction and stick with it. I heard some people are all-in on IBIT, while others only buy mining concept stocks. It feels like everyone is betting on their own logic. Industry chain companies are good, but their volatility is even more intense than the coins themselves, which is a bit scary. Actually, it all depends on personal risk tolerance. I prefer to buy coins directly—simple and straightforward.

View OriginalReply0

wrekt_but_learning

· 01-18 21:52

Honestly, buying coins directly is definitely more enjoyable, saving the hassle of dealing with so many middlemen... But the industry chain indeed has potential, it all depends on whether you can tolerate the feeling of being out of sync with the coin price. Worrying about this really wastes time; just allocate some to both, since it's all gambling anyway. These two lines often ignore each other, and last time I checked the growth comparison, I was stunned... Who is really hyping whom? I haven't been very optimistic about the funds in the chip sector, but some people have made money from it. The key is whether you can catch the right rhythm. It's more transparent to go straight into coins; the industry fund indicators are a headache to look at. ETFs are really for lazy people; if you want to make quick money, you need to research those small coins yourself. You need to be strong on both fronts to avoid being trapped by a single logic—that's the right way. This wave of industry-related projects might be a bit overhyped; the coins themselves are more straightforward. In the end, it's all about mindset—being able to hold on is the real key.

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-18 21:50

I'll just go directly for the coins; dealing with middlemen and their markup is too complicated.

View OriginalReply0

MeltdownSurvivalist

· 01-18 21:45

Just buy coins directly, what are you still thinking about? The rhetoric from industry chain companies sounds nice, but in reality, it's just a disguised way of harvesting retail investors.

View OriginalReply0