2026-01-18 21:34:28

Risk warning regarding this project: some emerging tokens have unreasonable liquidity structures. Taking a specific project as an example, its CEX liquidity ratio is only 10.8%—this number is quite dangerous. Generally, a liquidity ratio below 40% already signals high risk, let alone less than 11%.

What are the typical features of such projects? A large number of tokens are locked in other channels, and the liquidity available for trading on exchanges is severely insufficient, making them highly susceptible to manipulation. This kind of structural design often indicates questionable project quality.

If you are researching such projects, it is recommended to focus on: exchange liquidity ratio, concentration of holdings distribution, and the background of the management team. These indicators can help you quickly identify genuine projects and risky tokens.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-21 19:59

10.8%？Bro, are you playing with fire? --- Another tactic of liquidity manipulation to wipe out retail investors. I can see through this type of project with my eyes closed. --- I've said it before, checking the liquidity ratio is the fastest way to identify risks. --- They treat retail investors like ATMs; the team knows this well. --- I wouldn't even touch this kind of coin; it's too easy to be dumped on. --- By analyzing the distribution of holdings, you can tell who is the market maker—it's straightforward. --- 40% is already considered high risk, let alone this number, it's hilarious. --- It's tiring to keep teaching people how to identify garbage projects. --- If no one exposed it, how many people would still be trapped? --- I just want to know what the project team is thinking—are they real or fake?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 01-21 18:51

10.8% liquidity ratio? This is basically the template for scam coins. --- It's the same old trick, a classic method for big players to harvest retail investors. --- I've said it before, watch the liquidity distribution, but some still insist on jumping in. --- I've seen many coins like this; after three months, they either go to zero or get delisted. --- Why are people still touching this... If liquidity is below 40%, you should just blacklist it. --- With such a small market cap, how can they still boast about potential? Laughable. --- Honestly, those who don't check liquidity deserve to get trapped. --- What about the team background? Nine out of ten are probably some unknown entity...

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 01-21 09:05

10.8% liquidity? That's a minefield, just pass.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiSherpa

· 01-18 22:04

10.8%？Isn't this playing with fire? This is suicidal. --- It's that kind of lock-up scheme again, really annoying. --- With such low liquidity, dare to list? I really don't understand. --- A quick check of the team background reveals their true nature. I've seen too many projects like this. --- Has anyone really been cut by this kind of coin? Ask around. --- The concentration of holdings clearly shows the manipulator's tricks. --- I've said it before, below 40% is dangerous. 10.8% is an immediate pass, alright? --- The exchange liquidity is so poor, how can normal trading happen? --- The project quality is questionable, to be polite. I think it's just a way to cut the leeks. --- That's why I only stick to mainstream coins. It's too exhausting.

View OriginalReply0

MEVEye

· 01-18 21:55

10.8% liquidity? This is just farmland, a perfect setup before running away.

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 01-18 21:50

10.8% liquidity? Bro, this is basically a ticking time bomb. --- Another coin that's locked up, the exchange can't do anything about it. --- When evaluating a project, first look at the liquidity distribution. If this isn't done well, everything else is pointless. --- The concentration of holdings distribution is even more critical than the liquidity ratio; many people overlook this aspect. --- If they dare to design it like this, they either want to cut losses or want to die. --- 10.8% is almost the same as no liquidity at all; it's unplayable. --- We need to dig into the team background. Projects with poor liquidity usually have other hidden issues. --- Below 40%, it's time to avoid the trap. This guy was directly cut in half—typical scam. --- I've seen too many tricks with locked tokens; it's always the same routine. --- These kinds of coins always get trapped once touched; it's better to just go to zero after airdrops.

View OriginalReply0

MoonlightGamer

· 01-18 21:47

10.8%？Haha, are you joking? Definitely a pump-and-dump scheme. --- With such low liquidity, they still dare to pump the market. The manipulators are laughing their heads off. --- It's always the same trick: coins are locked on the exchange, and retail investors are just lambs waiting to be slaughtered. --- I don't understand why anyone would dare to touch this stuff. Just take one look and run. --- Team background is the real key; it's obviously a small workshop project. --- With such high concentration, you should have sold and exited long ago. No need to wait for a collapse. --- Another liquidity trap. Next time, just exclude this type of data directly. --- 11% liquidity? Wow, isn't this just a cash machine?

View OriginalReply0

BottomMisser