Someone managed to stay offline from staking validation for 18 straight days. That's quite the streak—most operators would struggle maintaining that kind of downtime without impacting their rewards or network participation metrics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WenAirdrop
· 01-21 00:17
Offline for 18 days? Is this guy trying to test the limits or what...
View OriginalReply0
TokenSherpa
· 01-21 00:11
actually, let me break this down—18 days offline is precisely where the governance precedent gets interesting. if you examine the data historically, most solo stakers hit penalty thresholds way sooner, so there's definitely something non-standard happening here with their validator setup or slashing mechanics
Reply0
HodlVeteran
· 01-18 22:09
Not verifying for 18 days? Dude, you're playing with fire. I also tried disconnecting for a week back in the day, and that penalty still hurts to this day [dog head]
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 01-18 22:08
Not going live for 18 days? This guy is really tough, not afraid of getting fined.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForever
· 01-18 22:06
Offline for 18 days? How resilient is this guy? If it were me, I would have been eliminated long ago for sticking to it like that, haha.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperer
· 01-18 22:03
18 days offline? Man, you must be really tough. I'm afraid of disconnecting every day...
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 01-18 21:59
18 days offline? This guy is really tough. I need to learn how he did it.
Someone managed to stay offline from staking validation for 18 straight days. That's quite the streak—most operators would struggle maintaining that kind of downtime without impacting their rewards or network participation metrics.