The SEC's landmark case against Ripple may have closed its courtroom doors permanently. Legal expert Bill Morgan emphasizes that res judicata—a fundamental legal principle preventing cases from being relitigated—creates an insurmountable barrier to reopening the case. Even as regulatory scrutiny around dropped crypto enforcement actions intensifies within the Securities and Exchange Commission, this particular battle appears legally sealed. What does this mean for the crypto industry? It signals that once major cases reach resolution through settlement or judgment, they're essentially locked in place. The implications extend beyond Ripple itself—it sets precedent for how concluded regulatory disputes can withstand future challenges and shifting political tides.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 01-21 17:11
According to the database, the SEC lawsuit against Ripple has officially entered a "permanent deferral" status. It has been three years since the last public dispute between the two parties, and the term "res judicata" is probably going to be added to the crypto glossary.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 01-21 00:07
Haha, res judicata is really a good thing. Now the SEC can't back out even if they want to.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMom
· 01-20 05:38
The SEC's lawsuit against Ripple is truly settled. Res judicata is a legal moat that prevents any chance of overturning the case.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapist
· 01-18 22:11
Res judicata really is a nightmare for regulators; once a judgment is made, it cannot be overturned.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 01-18 22:11
Haha, finally settled. The res judicata system is really awesome.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodger
· 01-18 22:10
Haha, res judicata is like a lifesaver for Ripple; no matter how much they struggle, they can't turn the tide.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 01-18 22:06
So this time Ripple really won big; the lawsuit has been definitively settled.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000
· 01-18 22:02
Res judicata really nailed the Ripple case; no matter how much they fuss afterward, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
orphaned_block
· 01-18 21:59
The Ripple case is considered to be completely settled. Res judicata is indeed a powerful move; no one can overturn it in the future.
The SEC's landmark case against Ripple may have closed its courtroom doors permanently. Legal expert Bill Morgan emphasizes that res judicata—a fundamental legal principle preventing cases from being relitigated—creates an insurmountable barrier to reopening the case. Even as regulatory scrutiny around dropped crypto enforcement actions intensifies within the Securities and Exchange Commission, this particular battle appears legally sealed. What does this mean for the crypto industry? It signals that once major cases reach resolution through settlement or judgment, they're essentially locked in place. The implications extend beyond Ripple itself—it sets precedent for how concluded regulatory disputes can withstand future challenges and shifting political tides.