Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
Trade global traditional assets with USDT in one place
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Participate in events to win generous rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and enjoy airdrop rewards!
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Simple Earn
Earn interests with idle tokens
Auto-Invest
Auto-invest on a regular basis
Dual Investment
Buy low and sell high to take profits from price fluctuations
Soft Staking
Earn rewards with flexible staking
Crypto Loan
0 Fees
Pledge one crypto to borrow another
Lending Center
One-stop lending hub
VIP Wealth Hub
Customized wealth management empowers your assets growth
Private Wealth Management
Customized asset management to grow your digital assets
Quant Fund
Top asset management team helps you profit without hassle
Staking
Stake cryptos to earn in PoS products
Smart Leverage
New
No forced liquidation before maturity, worry-free leveraged gains
GUSD Minting
Use USDT/USDC to mint GUSD for treasury-level yields
RWA Market Power Map: How 5 Major Protocols Are Reshaping Trillions in Institutional Capital Flows
The wave of RWA tokenization over the past six months has far exceeded market expectations. Institutional-grade assets on-chain have surpassed the $20 billion mark. This is not speculative hype but real capital migration happening. As traditional finance begins to consider deploying billions or hundreds of billions of dollars on blockchain, the question is no longer “whether” to go on-chain but “which chain” to choose.
The answer is: there is no single blockchain, only differentiated infrastructure. Rayls Labs, Ondo Finance, Centrifuge, Canton Network, and Polymesh are five protocols, each playing their respective roles in this institutional capital migration. They are not competitors but specialized solutions targeting different segments of the financial system.
Markets Ignored by Institutions Are Accelerating in Growth
Three years ago, RWA tokenization was almost nonexistent. By early January this year, this market had already approached $20 billion.
This is not just numerical growth but a structural shift. According to the latest market snapshot:
Key observation: the market is not “experimenting” with blockchain but “testing” which infrastructure can support real institutional capital.
Three major factors are accelerating this transformation:
The lure of yield arbitrage. Tokenized government bonds offer an annualized return of 4%-6%, with 24/7 real-time settlement support. Compared to traditional markets’ T+2 clearing cycle, this is irresistible for CFOs managing billions of dollars of idle capital. Private credit instruments even offer 8%-12% returns.
Regulatory frameworks are gradually taking shape. The EU’s MiCA regulations are being enforced in 27 countries. The US SEC is promoting on-chain securities frameworks through the (Project Crypto) initiative. Traditional clearinghouses like DTCC have received no-action letters and are beginning to tokenize assets natively.
Infrastructure is mature enough. Chronicle Labs has processed over $20 billion in total value locked (TVL). Halborn has completed security audits of major RWA protocols. These tools now meet fiduciary standards and are no longer “experimental” infrastructure.
However, challenges remain. Cross-chain transaction costs reach $1.3-1.5 billion annually, causing price differences of 1%-3% for the same asset across different chains. If this persists until 2030, annual costs could exceed $75 billion.
Three Solutions for Privacy and Compliance
Institutions have three core needs: privacy, compliance, and liquidity. Among the five protocols, Rayls, Canton, and Polymesh represent three completely different approaches.
Rayls Labs: The Privacy Fortress for Banks
Developed by Brazilian fintech Parfin, Rayls positions itself as a compliant bridge connecting banks and DeFi. Unlike other solutions, Rayls focuses on “what banks truly need,” rather than what DeFi communities imagine banks require.
Its Enygma privacy stack centers on zero-knowledge proofs, homomorphic encryption, and confidential payments. But the focus is not on technical specs; it’s on application: the Central Bank of Brazil uses it for CBDC cross-border settlement pilot, and Núclea employs it for receivables tokenization.
Recent developments are critical. In January 2026, Rayls completed a security audit by Halborn. More importantly, the AmFi alliance (Brazil’s largest private credit tokenization platform) committed to deploying $1 billion in tokenized assets on Rayls, aiming to reach this milestone by June 2027. This is not a pilot but a concrete milestone commitment.
Rayls’ risk lies in the lack of publicly available TVL data and client announcements outside of pilot projects. The $1 billion AmFi target becomes a decisive test of its credibility.
Canton Network: Permissioned Infrastructure for Wall Street
Canton’s roster of participating institutions is impressive: DTCC, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Citadel Securities. This is not a startup competing for institutions but Wall Street itself building new settlement infrastructure.
Canton aims to handle the $3.7 quadrillion annual settlement volume processed by DTCC in 2024. Yes, this number is not exaggerated.
Partnership with DTCC is a game-changer. With SEC no-action approval, some US Treasuries, partially custodied by DTCC, can be tokenized natively on Canton, with a planned minimum viable product (MVP) launch in the first half of 2026. DTCC and Euroclear serve as co-chairs of the Canton Foundation, not just participants but governance leaders.
Canton’s privacy architecture is based on Daml smart contracts: they specify which participants can see which data, regulators can access full audit logs, counterparties can view transaction details, but competitors and the public cannot see any information. For Wall Street institutions accustomed to dark pools, this design perfectly meets their needs—blockchain efficiency combined with traditional financial confidentiality.
In January 2026, Temple Digital Group launched a private trading platform on Canton supporting sub-second matching and non-custodial trading. Franklin Templeton manages $828 million in tokenized money market funds, and JPMorgan uses JPM Coin for payments and settlement.
Canton currently has over 300 participating institutions. But frankly, much of the reported trading volume may be more simulation than actual production flow. Speed is also an issue: the MVP scheduled for delivery in the first half of 2026 reflects multi-quarter planning cycles, whereas DeFi protocols can often launch new products within weeks.
Polymesh: Protocol-Level Compliance Design
Polymesh stands out by embedding compliance into the consensus layer rather than the smart contract layer. This means identity verification, transfer rules validation, and settlement are handled at the protocol level, with final settlement within six seconds.
Non-compliant transactions are rejected at the consensus stage, eliminating the need for customized audits. Republic began supporting private securities issuance in August 2025. AlphaPoint covers over 150 trading venues across 35 countries.
The advantage is clear: no need for custom smart contract audits; the protocol automatically adapts to regulatory changes. But the disadvantage is also clear: Polymesh runs as an independent chain, isolated from DeFi liquidity. A bridge to Ethereum is planned for Q2 2026, but whether it will be delivered on time remains uncertain.
Contrasting Scalability: Speed vs. Depth
If privacy and compliance represent the “direction” difference, Ondo and Centrifuge exemplify the contrast between “speed” and “depth.”
Ondo Finance: The Fast Lane for Cross-Chain Expansion
Ondo has achieved the fastest expansion from institutional to retail in RWA tokenization. As of January 2026:
The most aggressive move was on January 8: Ondo launched 98 new tokenized assets covering stocks and ETFs in AI, electric vehicles, and thematic investments. This is not testing the waters but full-scale push.
Plans to launch tokenized US equities and ETFs on Solana in Q1 2026 are its most aggressive attempt to enter retail-friendly infrastructure. The product roadmap aims to list over 1,000 tokenized assets.
Multi-chain deployment strategy is also clear: Ethereum provides DeFi liquidity and institutional legitimacy; BNB Chain covers exchange-native users; Solana supports large-scale consumer adoption.
Notably, even if Ondo’s token prices decline, TVL remains at $1.93 billion. This is the most important signal—protocol growth takes priority over speculation. The TVL growth during Q4 2025 market consolidation reflects genuine demand rather than chasing hype.
By establishing custody relationships with brokers-dealers, completing Halborn security audits, and launching products across three major blockchains within six months, Ondo has built a competitive moat. Its tokenized assets are about $162 million, compared to Backed Finance’s roughly $16.2 million.
But challenges exist: price volatility outside trading hours and strict KYC and accreditation restrictions limit the narrative of “permissionless”.
Centrifuge: Deep Deployment by Asset Managers
Compared to Ondo’s speed, Centrifuge represents the “depth” extreme. By December 2025, Centrifuge’s TVL soared to $1.3-1.45 billion, all from genuine institutional capital deployment.
The most critical case is Janus Henderson. This global asset manager with $373 billion AUM launched the Anemoy AAACLO fund—fully on-chain AAA-rated secured loan securities. The management team is the same as its $21.4 billion AAACLO ETF.
Furthermore, in July 2025, Janus Henderson announced plans to add $250 million on Avalanche. The Grove institutional credit protocol in Sky ecosystem also committed $1 billion in initial capital, with $50 million initially allocated. The founding team includes veterans from Deloitte, Citigroup, Block Tower Capital, and Hildene Capital Management.
The latest progress on January 8, 2026, is a partnership with Chronicle Labs oracle: through asset proof frameworks, Centrifuge provides cryptographically verified holdings data, supporting transparent NAV calculation, custody verification, and compliance reporting. This is not a future promise but an operational solution already in use.
Centrifuge’s operating model differs: instead of packaging off-chain products into tokens, it directly tokenizes credit strategies at issuance. The process: issuer designs the fund, institutions allocate stablecoins, funds flow to borrowers, and repayments are proportionally distributed to token holders. The annualized return on AAA assets ranges from 3.3% to 4.6%, fully transparent.
Multi-chain V3 architecture supports Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Celo, and Avalanche.
But issues are evident: a target annualized yield of 3.8% appears modest compared to the higher risks and returns historically available in DeFi. Attracting DeFi-native liquidity providers beyond Sky ecosystem allocations remains a challenge for Centrifuge.
The Market Is Not One Cake, But Five Different Markets
These five protocols do not compete directly. They address entirely different problems, so there are no “winners”—only “market segments.”
By solution category:
Privacy solutions are threefold—Canton based on Daml smart contracts, Rayls using zero-knowledge proofs, Polymesh via protocol-level identity verification. Each targets different privacy-transparency trade-offs.
Expansion strategies are also distinct—Ondo manages $1.93 billion across three chains prioritizing liquidity speed over depth; Centrifuge focuses on $1.3-1.45 billion in institutional credit, prioritizing depth over speed.
By target market:
Key insight: institutions will not choose “the best blockchain” but the infrastructure that best solves their specific compliance, operational, and competitive needs. A bank needs privacy; an asset manager seeks efficiency; Wall Street firms require compliant settlement infrastructure. These needs are entirely different, so the infrastructure should be different too.
Four Key Catalysts in 2026
The real test for the institutional RWA market will happen in 2026. Four milestones to watch:
Ondo’s Solana launch (Q1 2026)
This will test whether retail-scale issuance can generate sustainable liquidity. Success indicators are clear: over 100,000 holders, proving genuine demand.
Canton’s DTCC MVP (H1 2026)
Verify the feasibility of blockchain in US government bond settlement. If successful, trillions of dollars could shift onto on-chain infrastructure.
Centrifuge’s Grove deployment (All of 2026)
$1 billion allocation will be phased in. This will test the actual capital operation of institutional credit tokenization. If executed smoothly without credit events, it will significantly boost confidence among asset managers.
Rayls’ $1 billion AmFi target (Mid-2027)
A decisive test of its privacy infrastructure adoption.
Path to a $100 Trillion Market
What is the market outlook? The goal by 2030 is to reach $2-4 trillion in tokenized assets, requiring a 50- to 100-fold growth from the current $19.7 billion.
By industry segmentation:
The $100 billion milestone is expected around 2027-2028:
This requires a 5x increase from current levels. Is this aggressive? Yes. But considering the institutional momentum in Q4 2025 and upcoming regulatory clarity, it’s not out of reach.
Why the Next 18 Months Are Critical
Execution takes precedence over architecture; results matter more than blueprints. This is the core logic for 2026.
Ondo tests retail expansion, Canton tests institutional settlement, Centrifuge tests real capital for credit tokenization, Rayls tests privacy infrastructure adoption. These four parallel experiments will determine the ultimate flow of institutional capital on blockchain.
Traditional finance is heading toward a long-term on-chain migration. These five protocols provide the necessary infrastructure: privacy layers, compliance frameworks, and settlement infrastructure. Their success will shape the future development of tokenization—whether as efficiency improvements within existing structures or as a new system replacing traditional financial intermediaries.
The infrastructure choices made by institutions in 2026 will define the industry landscape for the next decade.
Trillions of dollars in assets are on the horizon.