Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
What is Korean martial law: the conflict between former President Yoon Suk-yeol's "rescue decision" and judicial rulings
Martial law in South Korea is the highest level of administrative authority that the president can invoke during a national emergency. Former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol has claimed that the decisions made using this authority were “inevitable rescue measures” for the nation and its citizens. According to reports from the cryptocurrency media Jin10, Yoon repeatedly expressed his views through his legal team, stating that his actions were decisions aimed at resolving difficulties arising from his own shortcomings.
Background and Political Context of the Martial Law Declaration
The martial law declared by Yoon Suk-yeol marked a significant turning point in South Korea’s political landscape. He explained that this decision was aimed at strengthening national defense capabilities and maintaining domestic order, and he continues to emphasize its necessity. A statement through his legal advisors highlighted the national circumstances that justified his judgment. Meanwhile, this decision drew criticism both domestically and internationally, leading to several legal issues.
Firm Opposition to Judicial Rulings and Legal Battles
Yoon Suk-yeol publicly voiced strong opposition to the life imprisonment sentence handed down in the initial trial. He expressed his inability to accept the verdict, and his legal team continues to pursue a counter-strategy. His response has further intensified debates over the separation of powers and the rule of law within South Korea’s judicial system. The series of legal decisions related to the martial law have become recognized as a significant case prompting a re-examination of the relationship between politics and the judiciary in South Korean society.