🔥 Recent on-chain trading terminal $Genius @GeniusTerminal trading volume is mainly concentrated on the BSC chain, while Solana ecosystem trading volume share is significantly lower, presenting obvious cross-chain differentiation.

📚 According to public data:
2026-03-09 (weekly data)
EVM trading volume: $556,916,284
Solana trading volume: $22,537,044
Total trading volume: $579,453,328
2026-03-14 (daily data)
EVM trading volume: $146,789,414
Solana trading volume: $6,836,838
Total trading volume: $153,626,252
✨ Due to the project's airdrop activity distributing a fixed 10 million points weekly, calculated from recent trading volumes, the average cost per point is approximately $0.03-0.08/point (allocation weights vary based on trading volume differences).
From a structural perspective:
EVM (primarily BSC) trading volume share accounts for approximately 95%
Solana trading volume share accounts for only approximately 4%-5%
This means $Genius current core liquidity almost entirely comes from the EVM ecosystem, especially BSC users, while Solana users' contribution to trading depth remains very limited.
From a market structure perspective, this phenomenon may be related to several factors:
Beyond CZ serving as project advisor at Yzhilabs, bringing great expectations to traders,
1️⃣ BSC users are more sensitive to high-frequency trading and airdrop activities
BSC has consistently been one of the most active public chains in the on-chain "volume farming ecosystem," with users showing higher engagement in trading incentives and airdrop activities.
2️⃣ EVM wallet and fund migration are more convenient
Large amounts of DeFi capital are already within the EVM system, with lower migration costs to Genius.
3️⃣ Solana ecosystem users' habits concentrate on native DEXs
Platforms like Jupiter and Raydium have already formed strong liquidity, making it difficult for new trading platforms to quickly capture market share.
Genius's trading volume appears to be cross-chain, but in reality remains a "BSC-driven platform."