Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I don't think this kind of comparison is really that meaningful.
On the surface, it's comparing what 100 yuan can buy in different countries. But in reality, you're not actually comparing the same products or the same consumption scenarios at all. Some use staple foods, some use beverages, some use fruits, and some even make emotionally-biased selections.
This method of calculation is inherently arbitrary. What you end up comparing isn't really purchasing power—it's more like viral content.
If you really want to compare purchasing power, you should at least use the same category of products, the same specifications, and the same city tier for comparison. For example, compare an ordinary working lunch across countries, compare a liter of milk, or compare what one hour of basic labor can get you.
Otherwise, today you're comparing French milk tea to American spicy strips, and tomorrow comparing Dubai cola to German roujiamo. It looks entertaining, but it's actually not very useful as a reference.
This is just content patchwork, isn't it? 😂