Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I've been thinking about this take from Vitalik on creator coins, and honestly it hits different when you step back from the hype. The whole premise of Web3 creator economy has been backwards from the start. Everyone's obsessed with tokenization, but the real bottleneck? It's not monetization. It's discovery. That's where curation actually matters.
Here's what's been bothering me: when you tie financial incentives directly to content, you don't get quality. You get noise. The system starts optimizing for engagement metrics and volume instead of what actually makes content worth consuming. Creator coins become pure speculation plays within weeks. The price movement becomes the whole story, and suddenly nobody cares about the actual creative work anymore. I've watched this cycle repeat with BitClout, Zora, and tons of other projects. The token launches, people trade it, and the original mission of supporting creators just evaporates.
Vitalik made a point that stuck with me: compare that to something like Substack. No tokens, no on-chain incentives, yet it actually discovered and elevated quality creators. Why? Because curation came first. Editorial judgment, reputation, network effects. That's the order that works. Quality before monetization, not the other way around.
The alternative Vitalik sketched out is interesting too. Forget massive token markets. Think smaller DAOs, lightly tokenized or not tokenized at all, where human judgment and reputation do the filtering. Limited scale by design. Higher signal density. It's less decentralized in the purist sense, but it actually produces the outcomes people wanted from Web3 in the first place.
I'm not saying creator coins have zero use case. They could work as forecasting tools if they're embedded in a real curation layer. But that requires flipping the whole approach. You build the social layer first, establish trust and editorial standards through curation, then maybe add tokens as a secondary mechanism.
The bigger picture is that markets are great for pricing assets, but they're not great for evaluating ideas or credibility. Web3 keeps trying to financialize everything, but sometimes the infrastructure that matters most isn't tokenized. It's just good curation.