Blockchain technology is at a critical turning point, with traditional transaction models facing significant changes. Anoma's intent-based architecture is revolutionarily challenging Ethereum's dominance, creating new possibilities for user experience and blockchain performance. This technological contest is not only about performance but also represents a fundamental shift in blockchain design philosophy.
Intent-Driven Architecture: A New Paradigm for Blockchain Interaction
Traditional blockchains require users to specify each transaction step precisely, just like having to plan every turn in detail from A to B. Anoma fundamentally changes this model, allowing users to only express the final goal, while the system automatically handles the implementation path.
This intent-based design brings three major breakthroughs to the blockchain:
· Abstract Complexity: Users only need to express the intention of "exchanging ETH for BTC" without worrying about routing, liquidity pools, or execution details.
· Global Intent Matching: The system automatically aggregates and combines complementary intents from different users to create the optimal execution path.
· Independence of the settlement layer: Intent can be settled on any Blockchain or centralized system, breaking the ecosystem barriers.
The Fundamental Differences with the Ethereum Trading Model
The transaction model of Ethereum requires users to explicitly specify each operational step, which becomes extremely cumbersome in complex scenarios. Taking cross-chain transactions as an example, users need to:
Initiate transactions on the original Blockchain.
Waiting for confirmation
Transfer assets through bridging protocols.
Execute the swap on the target Blockchain.
Confirm the final transaction
Anoma simplifies this process into a single intent expression, with the backend automatically coordinating the optimal execution path, significantly lowering the operational threshold for users.
Privacy-First Design: Practical Applications of Zero-Knowledge Technology
Privacy protection has become a key challenge in the development of Blockchain. Anoma adopts the Halo2 zero-knowledge proof system, achieving three layers of privacy protection:
· Selective Information Disclosure: Users can precisely control which information in the transaction is visible to whom.
· Transaction anonymity: Even on a public Blockchain, transaction details are difficult to trace and identify.
· Functional Privacy: Protects not only the content of transactions but also the purpose and functionality of transactions.
Taiga Protocol: Balancing Privacy and Transparency
The Taiga protocol from Anoma demonstrates how to achieve transaction privacy without sacrificing the transparency of the blockchain. This technology allows validators to confirm the legitimacy of transactions while keeping the transaction details private, finding a balance between regulatory compliance and user privacy.
In comparison, while Ethereum has privacy solutions, they are mostly added at the application layer and lack native support at the protocol level, resulting in incomplete privacy protection and lower efficiency.
Mixed Consensus Mechanism: Adaptive Security Model
Anoma's hybrid consensus mechanism breaks the "one-size-fits-all" security model and provides differentiated consensus options:
· Local Consensus: Provides low-latency settlement for transactions that need to be processed quickly.
· Global Consensus: Providing the highest security guarantee for high-value transactions
This flexible design allows the system to adaptively adjust the balance of security and performance according to different scenarios, rather than applying the same security standards to all transactions like Ethereum.
Resilient Design in Extreme Scenarios
Anoma's architecture specially considers extreme situations such as network partitioning or global conflicts. Even in the case of global consensus interruption, local consensus can still maintain basic functionality, ensuring the system's availability under various conditions.
The current blockchain ecosystem is facing a serious fragmentation issue. Ethereum's Rollups have increased throughput, but at the same time exacerbated the split in the ecosystem:
· Assets are locked in different Rollups.
· Developers need to deploy the same application for each Rollup.
· User experience is compromised due to the complexity of cross Rollup operations.
Anoma solves this problem through a unified intent layer, allowing intents to match and settle on any Blockchain, creating a seamless multi-chain experience.
Rollups essentially replicate Ethereum's EVM, providing only computational layer scalability. Anoma fundamentally rethinks the blockchain interaction model, achieving more efficient resource utilization through intent matching and composition.
Community-driven governance model
The tokenomics design of Anoma embodies its decentralized philosophy:
· A large proportion of token allocation is used for community governance.
· The long-term incentive mechanism ensures sustained development
· Community members directly participate in protocol upgrade decisions.
This model contrasts with the governance of Ethereum, which, although it also emphasizes community participation, has a more centralized decision-making process and is significantly influenced by the core development team.
Anoma's architecture natively supports cross-chain operations without the need for additional bridging protocols. Users can express intentions involving multiple Blockchains, and the system automatically coordinates the optimal execution path. This design significantly reduces the complexity and risks associated with cross-chain operations.
Through a unified intent layer, Anoma achieves the integration of cross-chain liquidity and state, addressing the issue of inefficient capital in the current Blockchain ecosystem. This feature is particularly important for DeFi applications, as it can significantly enhance capital efficiency.
Reflections on Rollups: Innovation or Replication?
The main criticism facing the current Rollups ecosystem is the lack of fundamental innovation. Most Rollups merely replicate Ethereum's EVM, failing to address the core issues of user experience and system design.
Anoma's intent-based architecture represents a forward-looking alternative that not only addresses scalability issues but fundamentally improves user experience and system efficiency.
Future Directions of Blockchain Innovation
The technical rivalry between Anoma and Ethereum reflects two approaches to blockchain development: incremental improvement and fundamental innovation. Ethereum expands the existing architecture through Layer 2 solutions, while Anoma rethinks the basic interaction model of blockchain.
The result of this technological competition will profoundly affect the development direction of Blockchain technology, determining the user experience and potential boundaries of future decentralized applications.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Intent Driven Revolution: How Anoma Challenges Ethereum's Blockchain Hegemony?
Blockchain technology is at a critical turning point, with traditional transaction models facing significant changes. Anoma's intent-based architecture is revolutionarily challenging Ethereum's dominance, creating new possibilities for user experience and blockchain performance. This technological contest is not only about performance but also represents a fundamental shift in blockchain design philosophy.
Intent-Driven Architecture: A New Paradigm for Blockchain Interaction
Traditional blockchains require users to specify each transaction step precisely, just like having to plan every turn in detail from A to B. Anoma fundamentally changes this model, allowing users to only express the final goal, while the system automatically handles the implementation path.
This intent-based design brings three major breakthroughs to the blockchain:
· Abstract Complexity: Users only need to express the intention of "exchanging ETH for BTC" without worrying about routing, liquidity pools, or execution details.
· Global Intent Matching: The system automatically aggregates and combines complementary intents from different users to create the optimal execution path.
· Independence of the settlement layer: Intent can be settled on any Blockchain or centralized system, breaking the ecosystem barriers.
The Fundamental Differences with the Ethereum Trading Model
The transaction model of Ethereum requires users to explicitly specify each operational step, which becomes extremely cumbersome in complex scenarios. Taking cross-chain transactions as an example, users need to:
Initiate transactions on the original Blockchain.
Waiting for confirmation
Transfer assets through bridging protocols.
Execute the swap on the target Blockchain.
Confirm the final transaction
Anoma simplifies this process into a single intent expression, with the backend automatically coordinating the optimal execution path, significantly lowering the operational threshold for users.
Privacy-First Design: Practical Applications of Zero-Knowledge Technology
Privacy protection has become a key challenge in the development of Blockchain. Anoma adopts the Halo2 zero-knowledge proof system, achieving three layers of privacy protection:
· Selective Information Disclosure: Users can precisely control which information in the transaction is visible to whom.
· Transaction anonymity: Even on a public Blockchain, transaction details are difficult to trace and identify.
· Functional Privacy: Protects not only the content of transactions but also the purpose and functionality of transactions.
Taiga Protocol: Balancing Privacy and Transparency
The Taiga protocol from Anoma demonstrates how to achieve transaction privacy without sacrificing the transparency of the blockchain. This technology allows validators to confirm the legitimacy of transactions while keeping the transaction details private, finding a balance between regulatory compliance and user privacy.
In comparison, while Ethereum has privacy solutions, they are mostly added at the application layer and lack native support at the protocol level, resulting in incomplete privacy protection and lower efficiency.
Mixed Consensus Mechanism: Adaptive Security Model
Anoma's hybrid consensus mechanism breaks the "one-size-fits-all" security model and provides differentiated consensus options:
· Local Consensus: Provides low-latency settlement for transactions that need to be processed quickly.
· Global Consensus: Providing the highest security guarantee for high-value transactions
This flexible design allows the system to adaptively adjust the balance of security and performance according to different scenarios, rather than applying the same security standards to all transactions like Ethereum.
Resilient Design in Extreme Scenarios
Anoma's architecture specially considers extreme situations such as network partitioning or global conflicts. Even in the case of global consensus interruption, local consensus can still maintain basic functionality, ensuring the system's availability under various conditions.
The current blockchain ecosystem is facing a serious fragmentation issue. Ethereum's Rollups have increased throughput, but at the same time exacerbated the split in the ecosystem:
· Assets are locked in different Rollups.
· Developers need to deploy the same application for each Rollup.
· User experience is compromised due to the complexity of cross Rollup operations.
Anoma solves this problem through a unified intent layer, allowing intents to match and settle on any Blockchain, creating a seamless multi-chain experience.
Rollups essentially replicate Ethereum's EVM, providing only computational layer scalability. Anoma fundamentally rethinks the blockchain interaction model, achieving more efficient resource utilization through intent matching and composition.
Community-driven governance model
The tokenomics design of Anoma embodies its decentralized philosophy:
· A large proportion of token allocation is used for community governance.
· The long-term incentive mechanism ensures sustained development
· Community members directly participate in protocol upgrade decisions.
This model contrasts with the governance of Ethereum, which, although it also emphasizes community participation, has a more centralized decision-making process and is significantly influenced by the core development team.
Cross-chain Functionality: Breaking Ecosystem Silos
Anoma's architecture natively supports cross-chain operations without the need for additional bridging protocols. Users can express intentions involving multiple Blockchains, and the system automatically coordinates the optimal execution path. This design significantly reduces the complexity and risks associated with cross-chain operations.
Through a unified intent layer, Anoma achieves the integration of cross-chain liquidity and state, addressing the issue of inefficient capital in the current Blockchain ecosystem. This feature is particularly important for DeFi applications, as it can significantly enhance capital efficiency.
Reflections on Rollups: Innovation or Replication?
The main criticism facing the current Rollups ecosystem is the lack of fundamental innovation. Most Rollups merely replicate Ethereum's EVM, failing to address the core issues of user experience and system design.
Anoma's intent-based architecture represents a forward-looking alternative that not only addresses scalability issues but fundamentally improves user experience and system efficiency.
Future Directions of Blockchain Innovation
The technical rivalry between Anoma and Ethereum reflects two approaches to blockchain development: incremental improvement and fundamental innovation. Ethereum expands the existing architecture through Layer 2 solutions, while Anoma rethinks the basic interaction model of blockchain.
The result of this technological competition will profoundly affect the development direction of Blockchain technology, determining the user experience and potential boundaries of future decentralized applications.