Recently, Disney has sparked controversy by suspending the late-night talk show "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" Several investors have submitted a letter to the company, requesting the disclosure of documents related to the decision to suspend the show, in order to clarify whether this decision was influenced by improper political factors or reflects issues with the company's governance.

The incident dates back to September 15, when the show host Jimmy Kimmel made comments regarding the shooting incident involving conservative activist Charlie Kirk. These remarks sparked intense discussions on social media, with some viewers deeming the comments inappropriate and biased. It is reported that senior government officials subsequently pressured Disney and its subsidiary ABC to take appropriate measures.

Subsequently, the two major television groups, Nexstar and Sinclair, chose to suspend the airing of the program, resulting in approximately 23% of households across the United States being unable to watch this popular comedy talk show. This situation is unprecedented in the broadcast history of the program. Ultimately, Disney decided to suspend the program's airing and conduct an internal review, but this decision raised external questions about whether the company was yielding to political interference.

The American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, and lawyers representing Reporters Without Borders have formally requested Disney to provide all documents related to the decision to suspend broadcasts. They hope to investigate whether the board violated its fiduciary duty due to political pressure or other interests. This move reflects investors' concerns about the transparency of corporate governance and worries about media independence.

This incident has sparked discussions about the complex relationship between media freedom, corporate governance, and political influence. It not only concerns the fate of a popular television program but also how media organizations maintain their editorial independence in the face of external pressures, and how publicly listed companies balance various interests. As the investigation progresses, the public will closely monitor the developments of this incident and its potential broader implications.