🍁 Golden Autumn, Big Prizes Await!
Gate Square Growth Points Lucky Draw Carnival Round 1️⃣ 3️⃣ Is Now Live!
🎁 Prize pool over $15,000+, iPhone 17 Pro Max, Gate exclusive Merch and more awaits you!
👉 Draw now: https://www.gate.com/activities/pointprize/?now_period=13&refUid=13129053
💡 How to earn more Growth Points for extra chances?
1️⃣ Go to [Square], tap the icon next to your avatar to enter [Community Center]
2️⃣ Complete daily tasks like posting, commenting, liking, and chatting to rack up points!
🍀 100% win rate — you’ll never walk away empty-handed. Try your luck today!
Details: ht
In the world of blockchain gaming, a player named Xiao Meng had a frustrating experience. When trying to synthesize a top-tier equipment, he found that despite collecting all the necessary materials according to the guide, the success rate was only 30%. Worse yet, all materials would be destroyed upon failure.
Unwilling to accept defeat, Xiao Meng decided to invest another 2000 yuan to purchase materials. However, after five consecutive failures, he finally succeeded, with the total cost far exceeding the price of directly purchasing the finished product. Even more concerning is that the game has not disclosed the specific calculation method for the synthesis success rate, which has raised players' doubts about the fairness of the game, suspecting that the success rate may be secretly adjusted, but they are unable to appeal due to a lack of evidence.
To address this issue, industry experts have proposed several suggestions: first, to incorporate the synthesis rules into smart contracts and publicly disclose the calculation formula for success rates, such as "base success rate of 30% plus a 10% bonus from material quality." In this way, players can verify the contract code through a blockchain explorer, ensuring the authenticity and immutability of the rules.
Secondly, develop a "Synthesis Simulation Tool" that allows players to input materials and simulate synthesis results and costs based on real-time on-chain data, helping players make more informed decisions. Finally, introduce a "Failure Protection Mechanism" where if a player fails three times in a row, the success rate of the fourth synthesis will automatically increase to 80% to protect the interests of casual players.
The implementation of these measures has shown significant effects: disputes related to synthesis have decreased by 90%, and players' trust in the synthesis system has increased by 85%. The "failure protection" mechanism has reduced the average synthesis cost for players by 40%, and the retention rate of medium and small recharge players has improved by 50%. These improvements have transformed the synthesis system in blockchain games from purely a "luck-based gamble" into a predictable and calculable game mechanism.
This case highlights the importance of fairness and transparency in blockchain games. With the promotion of these improvements, we have reason to believe that the future ecosystem of chain games will be more fair and transparent, providing players with a better gaming experience.