Today on Twitter, I saw a chart in various TG groups, showing that the overall performance of the newly launched coins is trending down.
So the "ride along" of blindly rushing into new projects has changed?
🌟Speculate on low liquidity
In fact, based on the performance of many new coins recently, they tend to drop after being listed on exchanges, while they perform better when they are only on the blockchain.
Ultimately, it is still linked to liquidity.
It's like assuming @Aster_DEX is not an order book but an AMM, the probability is high that the pool would be crushed by the brothers, not to mention the subsequent rally.
And yesterday's performance of $FF was also the same situation. After the delay in bn's spot, it remained around 0.6 on-chain, and as soon as bn's spot opened, it inverted directly and never went up again.
There are more new coins that can pump during the alpha phase, but once they go on contract or spot market, they go straight back home.
Moreover, when liquidity is poor, it is actually difficult for the project party to sell off and they can't make much money, so they are all "calling each other idiots" when liquidity is good.
🌟Strong consensus, strong buying power for the cake.
I think all recent projects, including but not limited to $ASTR , have shown a situation where the strong consensus leads to buying.
There is a significant difference between this and $XPL from yesterday. Yesterday, it opened and surged to $FF , and then I saw everyone being bearish. I was actually quite anxious, but since it opened earlier, it still provided an opportunity.
Whether it's @Plasma or @Aster_DEX, both provide ample space. Here, the so-called space refers to the space of "void", having their own "black box".
Other chains are giving everyone the opportunity to "arbitrage" for the sake of "consensus".
From everyone not daring to believe, to everyone starting to believe, then to everyone blindly believing, and finally to everyone saving their faith.
This is what the clever project team has been doing recently, dangling the "cake" in front of everyone. If they don't provide the "cake" and directly withdraw the liquidity pool, no one will follow.
🌟The pump brings believers, the dump is all fud.
Many things are actually a cake, but the interpretation of the rise and fall is different.
So what the next project party needs to consider is how to handle the selling pressure, while also attracting buying activity and creating a narrative for retail investors to outline.
Imagination can actually earn the most money, and blind trust can also make a lot of money.
🌟Is the new coin market over?
Many people are reviewing and saying that the new coin is over, the funding is over, etc.
In fact, looking back at recent times, there haven't been many opportunities to make money. Take @Plasma as an example; during the same period, if you bought $MYX , the returns were about the same. If you want to daydream, you could sell your ETH at a high position and then bet all in on $ETH to earn even more.
Actually, I have always been in "hard mode"; it's just that I happened to encounter "consensus" causing trouble.
Today AC organized a 1B money game again. Losing money should be the norm, right?
There are so many people using Perp Dex, losing money is probably the norm, right?
So there has never been a so-called end to the new coin market; it's just about whether you can seize the opportunity, as a decline is the norm.
So the truth of handing it over to the project party is also handing it over to the retail investors:
When the price is pumped, there will be people following; when the price is dumped, there will also be people following the dump.
The great Confucian of the pull market comes to debate!!!!
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
✍️New coin tide recedes?
Today on Twitter, I saw a chart in various TG groups, showing that the overall performance of the newly launched coins is trending down.
So the "ride along" of blindly rushing into new projects has changed?
🌟Speculate on low liquidity
In fact, based on the performance of many new coins recently, they tend to drop after being listed on exchanges, while they perform better when they are only on the blockchain.
Ultimately, it is still linked to liquidity.
It's like assuming @Aster_DEX is not an order book but an AMM, the probability is high that the pool would be crushed by the brothers, not to mention the subsequent rally.
And yesterday's performance of $FF was also the same situation. After the delay in bn's spot, it remained around 0.6 on-chain, and as soon as bn's spot opened, it inverted directly and never went up again.
There are more new coins that can pump during the alpha phase, but once they go on contract or spot market, they go straight back home.
Moreover, when liquidity is poor, it is actually difficult for the project party to sell off and they can't make much money, so they are all "calling each other idiots" when liquidity is good.
🌟Strong consensus, strong buying power for the cake.
I think all recent projects, including but not limited to $ASTR , have shown a situation where the strong consensus leads to buying.
There is a significant difference between this and $XPL from yesterday. Yesterday, it opened and surged to $FF , and then I saw everyone being bearish. I was actually quite anxious, but since it opened earlier, it still provided an opportunity.
Whether it's @Plasma or @Aster_DEX, both provide ample space. Here, the so-called space refers to the space of "void", having their own "black box".
Other chains are giving everyone the opportunity to "arbitrage" for the sake of "consensus".
From everyone not daring to believe, to everyone starting to believe, then to everyone blindly believing, and finally to everyone saving their faith.
This is what the clever project team has been doing recently, dangling the "cake" in front of everyone. If they don't provide the "cake" and directly withdraw the liquidity pool, no one will follow.
🌟The pump brings believers, the dump is all fud.
Many things are actually a cake, but the interpretation of the rise and fall is different.
Do you remember the difference before and after $FF went live, and also $WLFI $XPL $ASTR $FF $M .
So what the next project party needs to consider is how to handle the selling pressure, while also attracting buying activity and creating a narrative for retail investors to outline.
Imagination can actually earn the most money, and blind trust can also make a lot of money.
🌟Is the new coin market over?
Many people are reviewing and saying that the new coin is over, the funding is over, etc.
In fact, looking back at recent times, there haven't been many opportunities to make money. Take @Plasma as an example; during the same period, if you bought $MYX , the returns were about the same. If you want to daydream, you could sell your ETH at a high position and then bet all in on $ETH to earn even more.
Actually, I have always been in "hard mode"; it's just that I happened to encounter "consensus" causing trouble.
Today AC organized a 1B money game again. Losing money should be the norm, right?
There are so many people using Perp Dex, losing money is probably the norm, right?
So there has never been a so-called end to the new coin market; it's just about whether you can seize the opportunity, as a decline is the norm.
So the truth of handing it over to the project party is also handing it over to the retail investors:
When the price is pumped, there will be people following; when the price is dumped, there will also be people following the dump.
The great Confucian of the pull market comes to debate!!!!