Last night, Kuaishou had an incident. In the middle of the night, a large amount of inappropriate content suddenly flooded the live channel, and the platform's review system seemed to fail instantly, with the number of viewers in some rooms exceeding 100,000 at one point. The internet exploded—"What's wrong with Kuaishou" flooded social media. Hacker intrusion? System vulnerability? Or was a backend interface mistakenly triggered? The official response has not yet been made.

Imagine a platform with tens of millions of users suddenly falling into a trust crisis overnight. The issues reflected behind this are worth pondering. The vulnerability of centralized platforms lies here - a single point of failure can trigger a chain reaction. Review relies on human and algorithmic processes, operation and maintenance depend on teams, rules can be circumvented, and users often end up being the last to pay the price. Whether it's a content platform or a trading platform, the logic is the same.

Looking at it from a different angle, this perfectly illustrates why Web3 and decentralized architecture are worth serious consideration. Traditional platforms maintain order through centralized review, while distributed networks build a more resilient ecosystem through code consensus and transparency mechanisms. In the crypto world, the stability of assets no longer relies entirely on the credit endorsement of a particular institution, but is guaranteed by mathematics and algorithms.

USDD is a manifestation of this kind of thinking. As a decentralized over-collateralized stablecoin launched by the TRON DAO Reserve, its design logic is very clear: use transparency to combat uncertainty and use over-collateralization to cope with extreme volatility. Each USDD is backed by over 130% of on-chain assets, and the reserve address is completely public and traceable. Under this mechanism, you do not have to blindly trust any institution; data and code are the best endorsements.