2025-12-24 17:24:47

Injective's community buyback program has officially launched, this time using actual on-chain revenue to buy back INJ from the market and permanently burn it. Whitelist users can share in this portion of the profits proportionally.

The operation logic of this project is straightforward:

**Revenue sources** come from real on-chain earnings such as transaction fees within the ecosystem. **Buyback and burn** means these funds are used to repurchase $INJ from the market, which is then permanently destroyed, continuously reducing the circulating supply. The total cap of INJ is fixed at 100 million tokens. **User participation** allows whitelist users to commit $INJ and receive a proportional share of the current period’s profits.

Historically, participants in the previous rounds of activities have seen an average return of about 10%, with the latest round exceeding $250,000 in scale.

Injective is a blockchain platform focused on financial applications. INJ is used for network governance, staking, and paying fees. The project team has previously conducted multiple buybacks and burns, removing a significant amount of tokens. During recent related activities, the total locked value on the network increased, and ecosystem activity remained stable. Among major Layer 1 blockchains, Injective’s revenue ranking has already moved into the top tier.

From a market perspective, this buyback and burn mechanism could theoretically support the token price by reducing circulating supply. Historical market data also shows that market attention tends to increase around such activities. For the community, this mechanism directly rewards eligible participants with a share of ecosystem profits, encouraging long-term token holding. The project team continues to expand ecosystem collaborations and application scenarios to further enhance the network’s practicality.

In essence, Injective’s approach combines buyback and burn with user rewards, using real on-chain revenue to buy back and permanently destroy tokens, then sharing the profits proportionally with active users. This is not a new concept; it’s something that happens transparently and verifiably every month. It truly rewards contributors with the results of ecosystem growth, rather than just making slogans or short-term incentives.

This also reflects Injective’s consistent style—pursuing technological excellence and emphasizing long-term alignment and sustainability in economic design. In an era where DeFi increasingly values practicality and real earnings, such an approach may well be the future.

INJ0.5%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationWizard

· 5h ago

It's the usual buyback and burn routine, but this time it seems a bit different. An average return of 10%? Wait, it has to actually be received to count. Whitelist is back again, playing this game every time, everyone understands the threshold. But INJ is indeed serious this time, with real on-chain income used for buybacks and burns, which is much more reliable than those vapor projects. A round of $250,000 indicates that the community is truly participating, not just a slogan. Finally, it all comes back to that question—where is my whitelist invitation code?

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 5h ago

Actual revenue repurchase and destruction, this is true hard currency, unlike some projects that shout concepts every day --- The whitelist is back again, still the same group of people eating meat, retail investors can't even get a sip of soup --- 10% annualized sounds good, but you need to get a whitelist spot first --- The logic behind INJ is actually quite clear, real gold and silver buybacks and burns, not just a numbers game --- Continuing down the path of decreasing supply, there is long-term potential and room for imagination --- No matter how good the words are, it depends on whether the subsequent trading volume can support it, otherwise the buyback space will become smaller and smaller --- Compared to other L1 revenue rankings, INJ indeed has some real skills --- Monthly transparent verification is a plus, but I still want to see how long it can actually be maintained --- A scale of $250,000 is still small compared to the market capacity

View OriginalReply0

ThatsNotARugPull

· 5h ago

10% return? Feels a bit suspicious. Who still believes in this these days? Real income buyback and burn, I buy into that. Just need to be clear on the whitelist part. Injective has indeed put effort into this area, unlike some projects that just hype without delivering. Wait, a $250,000 scale—what level is that? Still a bit small. Ultimately, it still depends on whether they can truly stabilize the income in the future. If this logic checks out, it's definitely worth paying attention to. But I'm still waiting to see data in one or two months. Is the contract code open source? Need to verify it myself first. Feels much better than just a simple inflation tax, at least there's actual income supporting it. How is the whitelist distributed? Is it the same old routine? Permanent burn sounds good, but gotta watch out for them changing their mind.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoChain

· 5h ago

Real income buyback and burn, this is the right way A 10% return is pretty good, try to get on the whitelist Wait, is the $250,000 scale still increasing? INJ this wave has some substance, not just an air project Holding tokens feels like earning dividends, long-term holding is more motivating By the way, why haven't other projects learned from this mechanism?

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 5h ago

Real income buyback and burn, this is what should be done A 10% return sounds good, but what is the whitelist threshold? INJ's recent actions are much more reliable than those projects that shout about buybacks every day With a scale of 250,000 USD, there’s still room to grow, right? The supply has been reduced so many times, why hasn’t the price gone up? It’s a bit suspicious Is permanent destruction truly permanent, or is it just like some previous projects that set traps? Active users sharing profits, what about ordinary holders? Are they being cut? This kind of mechanism can’t be copied by others, it requires real income to work Monthly transparent and verifiable, I believe in this, at least it’s not bragging like some projects In the DeFi era, you have to play like this—solid, real stuff, everything else is just虚的

View OriginalReply0

StealthMoon

· 5h ago

Real revenue directly used for buyback and burn—that's what I want to see. Don't give me those虚的 --- Whitelist prices have gone up again. A 10% yield sounds good, but it depends on when you enter --- Injective's approach is indeed transparent, much more reliable than those projects that boast every day --- A scale of 250,000? I just want to know when retail investors will get a chance to participate... --- The key is whether the burn volume can truly drive the price up; there's a big gap between theory and reality --- I respect the permanent burn; unlike some projects that burn and then issue more tokens --- Leading in revenue ranking but the price is still falling—it's hard to explain that --- If it's truly happening every month transparently, then why haven't I seen any related on-chain data update notifications? --- If INJ can really run, this mechanism will become more and more popular --- Sounds good, but the key is whether they can protect the market from manipulation

View OriginalReply0

StrawberryIce

· 5h ago

Real on-chain income repurchase and burn, now that's genuine sincerity. To be honest, I'm tempted by the 10% yield, but I need to see if I can get on the whitelist first. INJ's recent actions are much more reliable than some projects that boast about buybacks every day. A $250,000 scale can still grow; the ecosystem is truly being used by real users. Permanent destruction of supply, in theory, does help the price, but it depends on whether they can sustain it in the future.

View OriginalReply0