Imagine one day, if governments around the world impose a 30% special tax on cross-border transfers exceeding $1,000 to fill tax gaps, what would happen? For the hundreds of millions of families and small to medium-sized foreign trade businesses relying on international remittances, this would undoubtedly be a nightmare. Traditional banking channels would turn into real "vampire pipelines."



But here’s an interesting twist—USDD stablecoin based on the Tron blockchain might play an unexpected role in such a scenario. Not to help evade taxes (let’s clarify that), but to demonstrate the inherent technical features of decentralized payment networks:

**The invisibility of data flow**
A SWIFT transfer is clearly visible in traditional systems—sender, receiver, amount—tax authorities can precisely identify and intercept. But on-chain USDD transfers are different. Transactions are essentially encrypted signed data hashes. The network only verifies the validity of signatures and cannot determine the specific commercial purpose of the transfer. This technical aspect effectively blocks the possibility of "scanning for specific amounts and automatically deducting taxes."

**Cost advantage that crushes traditional methods**
The cost structure of fiat systems is like this: 30% heavy tax plus 5% fee, totaling nearly 40%. In contrast, cross-chain USDD transfers? The cost is almost negligible. This difference alone highlights the issue.

Of course, this is just a hypothetical scenario. But it does touch on a real phenomenon: more and more people are beginning to reassess the role of crypto payments in global liquidity.
USDD0.02%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropFreedomvip
· 4h ago
Sounds ideal, but can it really be bypassed? Or will the government eventually find a way to block this loophole?
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobiavip
· 4h ago
Wait, a 30% special tax? Isn't that just a disguised way of extorting money... USDD's approach is indeed clever, but frankly, if the government gets really desperate, there are still other ways to get you. Technically, there's no escape.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 4h ago
Damn, 30% tax rate? Isn't that outright robbery, brother? Wow, the operations on the Tron chain are really fierce, the cost is far beyond traditional banks by more than one level. Really? On-chain transfers truly can't track commercial purposes? This technical feature is a bit outrageous. Wait, the part about tax evasion clarification is a bit unnecessary, everyone understands. USDD, this stablecoin, is really going to be popular. Why are those people still using SWIFT for international remittances? Data invisibility is indeed a natural advantage of the chain; traditional banks can't do this. With such a huge cost difference, ordinary people should have switched long ago. By the way, the hypothetical scenario is fake, but the total cost of 40% is really shocking. That's not right, can decentralized payments really bypass regulation completely? It's a bit uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomatonvip
· 4h ago
30% tax? Damn, if that really happens, remittance workers will go bankrupt instantly, and the banks will be laughing their heads off. USDD's approach indeed bypasses the outrageous fee structures of traditional systems, though I must emphasize it's not about playing tricks; it's just how the technology is built. On-chain transparency is there, but you really can't track what you're doing with a stablecoin transfer, the difference is huge. --- But speaking of which, if the government really does this, they'll definitely be trying to block the loopholes on the chain, it's always an arms race, endless. --- Honestly, it's still a cost issue. A 40% total cost compared to almost zero on-chain costs—who would be foolish enough to use banks? That's why more and more people are turning to crypto. --- It's a bit ironic, in the end, the unstoppable factor is the technology itself. No matter how strict the regulation, it can't beat a distributed network. Eventually, everyone will have to admit this.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarianvip
· 4h ago
Honestly, I believe in this logic, but can the government just sit and wait? They'll just ban the trading pairs directly then.
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 4h ago
Basically, the government is desperate for money, and the ones suffering are those who rely on remittances to survive. Wait, isn't this just arguing that crypto is convenient for tax evasion... Although the article says "to clarify," isn't that the implication? USDD's low cost is true, but if it were to be used on a large scale, would the government just sit and wait? At that point, they might start restricting wallets. Speaking of which, a 40% cost is indeed outrageous; on-chain costs are almost zero. Once this gap appears, who would still use banks?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)