The Financial Services Commission (FSC) of South Korea is considering implementing a new "Payment Freeze" regulatory system aimed at directly freezing the funds of accounts suspected of market manipulation. This move marks another aggressive step forward in South Korea's cryptocurrency regulation.



In simple terms, once identified as suspected of price manipulation (such as pump-and-dump or other abnormal trading behaviors), users' funds could be directly frozen on exchanges or bank accounts, preventing withdrawals or transfers. This goes beyond previous real-name verification requirements—upgrading from identity authentication to fund control.

South Korea has long been regarded by the industry as one of the most tightly regulated crypto markets. From early real-name registration for exchanges and bans on anonymous wallets to the current payment freeze proposal, the country's regulatory approach has become increasingly detailed and multi-dimensional. In the short term, this new policy may impact institutions engaged in high-frequency trading or hedging strategies, but from a market fairness perspective, curbing manipulation does have its rationality.

However, several practical issues are evident: First, how to precisely define "suspicious manipulation"? There is a significant risk of mistakenly penalizing normal retail traders. Second, how to control cross-border capital flows? The global exchange data sharing mechanism is still far from perfect. Third, can this regulatory approach truly prevent highly covert manipulation techniques, such as small batch operations or over-the-counter (OTC) trading?

It is worth noting that this policy is still under discussion, and formal implementation remains to be seen. At the same time, even if the policy is enacted, market participants will quickly adjust their strategies—liquidity may shift to regions with looser regulations or to OTC markets. Excessive regulation often creates "policy arbitrage" opportunities.

This regulatory upgrade in South Korea's crypto market reflects a global emphasis on market transparency and fairness. However, how to strike a balance between cracking down on violations and protecting legitimate trading remains a challenging issue.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeJumpervip
· 01-09 09:37
Frozen accounts again, Korea is really unbelievable. Now retail investors have an even harder time surviving. --- Basically, it's fear of manipulation, but as a result, normal traders are also being harmed. Who will set the standards for defining manipulation? --- Haha, liquidity is fleeing elsewhere. The stricter the regulation, the easier it is to arbitrage. This trick is old. --- If this is truly enforced, what are small retail investors like us supposed to do? Everything will be frozen. --- The question is, how to determine manipulation? Do all coins with a significant price increase need to be investigated? Ridiculous. --- Someone will always find a way. Regulation can never keep up with innovation. That's common sense. --- Korea's regulation has always been so strict. No wonder trading volume is moving to Southeast Asia, and the money has already left.
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrowervip
· 01-08 02:20
Oh my, can Korean retail investors survive like this? Directly freezing funds is like a pre-emptive house search before sentencing.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 01-06 15:51
Frozen funds again, Korea's tactics are really top-notch, but who can define what manipulation really is? I just want to ask, would normal hedging orders get caught in the crossfire? Retail investors have it even harder now; they need to quickly move their trades elsewhere. Speaking of, the stricter the regulation, the faster the liquidity flows out. This wave might actually make the market more fragmented. This freeze funds move feels even harsher than banning exchanges.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwinvip
· 01-06 15:33
Frozen accounts again? Korea's tricks have long been tired of playing, retail investors are once again caught in the crossfire The policy arbitrage space is well explained. Instead of fussing, it's better to see clearly where the funds are flowing Precise definition of manipulation? It's here, but no matter how you define it, it's all fuzzy accounts Only when the money is gone do you realize what true market fairness is. Laughing to death Alright, alright, I bet five dollars that liquidity will flow to Singapore within a week Isn't it just authoritarian control? Why insist on packaging it as fairness? Cross-border data sharing isn't even settled yet, and they start freezing money. This logic is truly brilliant Small retail investors now say, even doing a normal transaction has to be done cautiously
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)