2026-01-07 17:42:56

Creditors face a tough call as a major luxury retailer teeters on the brink of collapse. The core dilemma is brutal and straightforward: extend more capital to a company hemorrhaging cash, or cut losses and walk away? Lenders are caught between two equally uncomfortable positions—pump more money into an uncertain recovery, or risk getting nothing at all when bankruptcy becomes inevitable. It's the kind of game where everyone might lose.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVHunterNoLoss

· 01-10 17:29

It's the same old trick... Creditors are stuck with losses, and the money-losing entity still wants to continue financing. A classic case of the "sunk cost fallacy."

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSurvivor

· 01-10 03:33

Another mess like this, either throw money or admit defeat, it's all a huge loss anyway.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-07 18:08

Look at this typical black hole of funds... Someone has already started transferring assets on the chain. I checked the wallet addresses, and the early large holders' fund migration patterns are too suspicious. Dormant addresses suddenly become active, this is no coincidence.

View OriginalReply0

HalfPositionRunner

· 01-07 18:05

It looks like a dead end; the chances of throwing more money into the water are even higher.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 01-07 18:00

This is a typical "hot potato"; whoever takes it will have bad luck.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationHunter

· 01-07 17:43

Honestly, this is a dead end... Continuing to pour money in is like throwing it away, and pulling out would mean a huge loss. I think the players will collectively explode this time.

View OriginalReply0