The founder of a leading compliant exchange recently made a public statement, strongly opposing the CLARITY Act. This move was truly unexpected — it directly brought the previously behind-the-scenes interests into the spotlight, intensifying conflicts among all parties.

The complexity of the situation lies here: legislative bodies had already conducted multiple rounds of private negotiations before the bill vote, with the Banking Committee and Agriculture Committee both involved. All parties had been secretly vying for influence. But this time, the founder’s angry rebuke changed the game. His statement not only tore apart the façade of "civil negotiations" but also pushed everyone into a no-win situation with no room for maneuver.

As a result, the bill now faces the risk of being withdrawn. Things that could have been pushed forward in the gray area are now all under the spotlight. In political games, when all the cards are on the table, no one can continue to move forward. This is the most awkward situation.