The recent situation surrounding $HYPE EVM launches raises serious concerns about builder confidence in the ecosystem. When influential voices within the community championed these initiatives, there was genuine expectation for quality execution.



Instead, this debacle undermines credibility across the board. Why would legitimate developers commit to $HYPE infrastructure when ecosystem coordination appears this fragmented?

Projects entering this space now face an uphill battle. Some like Trove Markets will inevitably bear the consequences of broader ecosystem failures, regardless of their individual merit. The damage extends beyond individual protocol failures—it's fundamentally about ecosystem reliability and execution capability.

This is the kind of operational failure that reshapes builder sentiment in the medium term.
HYPE1.07%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketNoodlervip
· 4h ago
hmm $HYPE this wave indeed underperformed, no matter how loudly the big V's hype it up, it's useless. Once builder confidence collapses, it's hard to restore. History has proven this countless times.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 4h ago
ngl this wave of $HYPE really flopped, no matter how loudly the big V promotes it, it can't save the unfinished project
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperervip
· 4h ago
wallet clustering on $HYPE rn screaming "accumulation phase over" but nobody wants to read the on-chain signals... predictable honestly
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)