Let's be real here—intellectual property theft and unauthorized use of someone's brand is genuinely problematic, no two ways about it. But we need to separate this from what's actually happening in the meme coin space.



When people jump into these token lotteries, they're not exactly victims being conned by some elaborate scheme. They're consciously rolling the dice on speculative plays. There's no hidden agenda, no smoke and mirrors—just raw market dynamics playing out.

The $150K in question? That's part of the game. The brand infringement angle is a legitimate beef, but let's not conflate that with ordinary traders getting scammed. These are two different issues entirely.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RetiredMinervip
· 6h ago
Honestly, meme coins are just a gambler's game, there's nothing to pretend about. Brand infringement is indeed not proper, but those who really jump in know what they're doing—it's all in or nothing. Losing 150k, you can't blame anyone; that's just the market.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTradervip
· 6h ago
ngl, this logic is a bit shady... Is it really just "rolling the dice"? What were the people who lost 150k thinking?
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 6h ago
Based on on-chain data analysis, this article's argumentative framework contains an incentive misalignment flaw. While brand infringement and speculative behavior can be distinguished, from the perspective of Token economics, both actually share the same game-theoretic equilibrium—that is, market failure caused by information asymmetry. It is recommended to re-examine the rational assumptions of the participants.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 6h ago
Wait, is the $150K really just "part of the game"? I need to check the on-chain data to confirm...
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidatorvip
· 6h ago
NGL, this logic seems a bit forced. Can brand infringement and pulling the wool over investors' eyes really be so cleanly separated? They're probably just part of the same套路链.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)