MicroStrategy's leader Michael Saylor recently shared the company's core logic behind Bitcoin allocation. According to his explanation, the strategy adopted by MSTR theoretically can create a buying pressure that surpasses the market selling pressure.



The implications behind this statement are worth pondering— in the Bitcoin market, when large-scale institutional buying power continues to enter, the supply-side selling pressure often struggles to absorb it. Saylor emphasized that through carefully designed capital structures and financing arrangements, MicroStrategy can maintain its continuous absorption of Bitcoin.

From another perspective, this reflects institutional investors' confidence in Bitcoin's long-term value, and also hints at the structural asymmetry in the market— the purchasing power of large buyers may be gradually reshaping Bitcoin's supply and demand dynamics. Such views are becoming increasingly common in discussions about institutional crypto asset allocation, reflecting a subtle shift in the traditional financial world's attitude towards digital assets.
BTC-2.69%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FromMinerToFarmervip
· 10h ago
Saylor, that old fox, is starting to tell stories again. It sounds pretty intimidating, but honestly, it just means if you have money, you can dump the market.
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlookervip
· 10h ago
Saylor's way of speaking sounds good, but can it really keep going? It would be awkward if the funding chain can't be turned around.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHighvip
· 10h ago
Saylor really knows how to tell a story; it sounds just like a legitimate reason for institutions to accumulate shares.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 10h ago
Still watching the market at 3 AM... Saylor's logic is actually describing a liquidity gap. Once large buyers keep entering, retail investors' selling pressure can't form reverse pressure at all. Market efficiency is severely unbalanced.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoetvip
· 10h ago
Saylor's logic of buying and buying sounds quite solid, but I don't know how long he can stick to it.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 10h ago
Saylor's rhetoric sounds very nice, but can it really create such strong buying pressure, or is it just storytelling? No matter how MSTR's financing structure is designed, the supply isn't that tight to begin with, so how can it be reshaped? How long has the institutional entry been hyped? The gains that should have happened already have, and now talking about this is a bit late. Honestly, it still depends on whether they can truly absorb that much BTC later on; otherwise, it's just a paper story. This logic seems to be just endorsing their own holdings, don't believe it too much.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 10h ago
Saylor's rhetoric sounds pretty good, but to be honest, it's just throwing money... The continuous absorption ability sounds like it can absorb infinitely, but in reality...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)