2026-01-18 19:34:09

The real highlight of Sei Network is not the absolute number of transactions, but who is truly participating in the ecosystem.

The data is in front of us: Kindred AI is leading, with transaction users surpassing 100,000. World of Dypians, Mokoko, and Sugar Senpai follow closely, each attracting tens of thousands of active users. Match Fighters and other ecosystem applications are also contributing to the user base.

What does this indicate? It's not just about transaction popularity, but about actual applications driving genuine user engagement. When different applications can maintain a substantial active user base, ecosystem stickiness becomes even more meaningful. This multi-application support structure is much healthier than relying on a single hot spot in the chain.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugpullTherapist

· 12h ago

So now it's all about ecosystem depth; simply chasing numbers is already outdated.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 12h ago

Multi-chain veteran, Sei's ecosystem blooming in multiple areas is indeed different Kindred AI has surpassed 100,000 users, but I am more concerned whether these people are truly engaged or just riding the hype This is the real deal, diversified applications > single-point viral hits

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterX

· 12h ago

Honestly, Kindred AI's hundred thousand users do have some substance, but whether other applications can truly retain talent is the key. Supporting multiple applications sounds good, but it depends on whether they can maintain popularity in the future. The decentralized user base of the Sei ecosystem is indeed more stable than relying on a single chain dependent on a hot project. It seems that the application ecosystem is the real test for a blockchain; transaction volume is an outdated metric. By the way, how is the actual retention rate of these applications? Has anyone tracked it? The concept of ecosystem stickiness is a bit superficial; only real users staying with the platform counts. A bullish pattern sounds healthy, but can ordinary users really perceive any difference?

View OriginalReply0

HappyToBeDumped

· 12h ago

This is the real truth. It's not just about the numbers looking good; there has to be real people playing for it to count.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 12h ago

ngl, this ecosystem diversity thing sounds good on paper but... have you actually checked the liquidity fragmentation across these apps? kindred ai hitting 100k users doesn't mean shit if they're all yolo-ing on the same attack vector. seen this movie before with other chains—multiple apps ≠ actual product-market fit, just means more surface area for exploits lmao

Reply0