Take a look at this breakdown – it's actually pretty amusing when you really examine what's happening.
See that dotted line sitting right at the 1 mark? That's showing the total number of sequencers managing your Layer 2 holdings. Yeah, just one. Single point of failure managing the whole operation.
This raises some interesting questions about what decentralization actually means in the current L2 landscape. When sequencer operations stay that consolidated, it sort of defeats the original purpose, doesn't it? Your assets are technically on chain, but the throughput and transaction ordering? That's all flowing through a bottleneck.
The irony is pretty thick here. Users migrate to L2 solutions thinking they're getting scalability benefits, but if the sequencer infrastructure remains this centralized, you're trading off decentralization for speed. Worth thinking about before you stack your bags on a single sequencer system.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 18m ago
NGL, this is a joke. One sequencer dares to call itself an L2 solution? It's just decentralization hype.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 18h ago
One sequencer can control the entire scene? Isn't that just centralized control with a different disguise? LOL
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keys
· 18h ago
ngl this is a joke... The single sequencer still dares to call itself L2?
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 18h ago
NGL, this is a joke. One sequencer supports the entire L2 ecosystem, and it still dares to call itself decentralized.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 18h ago
A single sequencer dares to claim decentralization? Laughable. That's why I dislike L2.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHunter
· 18h ago
Laughing out loud, one sequencer supports the entire L2, this is what we call decentralization haha
Take a look at this breakdown – it's actually pretty amusing when you really examine what's happening.
See that dotted line sitting right at the 1 mark? That's showing the total number of sequencers managing your Layer 2 holdings. Yeah, just one. Single point of failure managing the whole operation.
This raises some interesting questions about what decentralization actually means in the current L2 landscape. When sequencer operations stay that consolidated, it sort of defeats the original purpose, doesn't it? Your assets are technically on chain, but the throughput and transaction ordering? That's all flowing through a bottleneck.
The irony is pretty thick here. Users migrate to L2 solutions thinking they're getting scalability benefits, but if the sequencer infrastructure remains this centralized, you're trading off decentralization for speed. Worth thinking about before you stack your bags on a single sequencer system.